
Loyola Maryland
12-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.8%Loyola Maryland
80.2%Colgate
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADColgate -9.4
PROJECTED TOTAL154.0
MODEL MONEYLINEColgate -405

Colgate
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLoyola Maryland 72
Projected Total154.0
Projected ScoreColgate 82
Team Comparison
40.8MMH Power Index48.8
108.1Offensive Efficiency111.7
110.7Defensive Efficiency109.0
-2.6Net Efficiency2.7
-5.0Strength of Schedule-2.0
-5.1Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.3
69.6Tempo68.4
51.2%Effective FG%54.5%
15.7%Turnover Rate14.8%
29.4%Offensive Rebound %26.9%
31.0%Free Throw Rate30.0%
-1.8Average Margin1.8
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Colgate HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMColgate holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (48.8–40.8), offensive efficiency (111.7–108.1), defensive efficiency (109.0–110.7), net efficiency (2.7–-2.6).
Loyola Maryland COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (29.4–26.9), free throw rate (31.0–30.0).