Central Connecticut logo

Central Connecticut

18-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
60.2%Central Connecticut
39.8%Chicago State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCentral Connecticut -3.3
PROJECTED TOTAL143.7
MODEL MONEYLINECentral Connecticut -151
Chicago State logo

Chicago State

7-25
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreCentral Connecticut 73
Projected Total143.7
Projected ScoreChicago State 70

Team Comparison

44.4MMH Power Index36.1
111.4Offensive Efficiency99.4
107.0Defensive Efficiency114.9
4.4Net Efficiency-15.5
-7.7Strength of Schedule0.5
-0.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-4.3
66.3Tempo66.2
54.0%Effective FG%45.6%
15.9%Turnover Rate15.8%
28.2%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
31.3%Free Throw Rate30.7%
2.9Average Margin-10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Central Connecticut HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY60.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCentral Connecticut holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (44.4–36.1), offensive efficiency (111.4–99.4), defensive efficiency (107.0–114.9), net efficiency (4.4–-15.5).
Chicago State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.5–-7.7), ball security (15.8–15.9), offensive rebounding (29.1–28.2).
Final
Central Connecticut logo
Central Connecticut
51—70
Chicago State logo
Chicago State
Chicago State by 19 • 61.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Central ConnecticutTEAM STATChicago State
17-55FG26-62
31.0%FG%42.0%
5-243PT8-28
21.0%3PT%29.0%
12-15FT10-12
80.0%FT%83.0%
40Rebounds37
14Offensive Rebounds11
11Assists21
14Turnovers5
3Steals10
3Blocks1
13Fouls18

Player Box Score

Central Connecticut
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Darin Smith Jr.F386-182-65-662100019
James JonesG322-50-34-44010008
Jay RodgersG343-51-20-03300007
Max FrazierF273-80-01-28202007
Roddy JonesG171-71-60-01100003
Melo SanchezG121-51-50-02000003
Ashton ReynoldsG120-20-12-22001002
Jayden MottF101-30-00-02100002
Elijah ParkerG140-20-10-03210000
Daniel JamesF30-00-00-11000000
Nico AshleyF10-00-00-00000000
Chicago State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
CJ RayF337-121-20-091100015
Marcus TankersleyG323-91-27-847100014
Doyel Cockrill IIIG304-144-132-224100014
Stephen ByardF266-61-11-240000014
Braelon BushG282-71-40-03600005
Malek RobinsonG112-50-20-00040004
Dailliss CoxF91-20-00-04110002
Joseph OwensF71-10-00-02001002
Corey SandsG100-30-30-00020000
Daniel ZatsepinF70-10-00-03000000
Chauncey GibsonG70-20-10-01200000

Advanced Game Stats

61.9Possessions61.9
82.4Offensive Efficiency113.1
113.1Defensive Efficiency82.4
-30.7Net Efficiency30.7
35.5%Effective FG%48.4%
41.0%True Shooting %51.7%
22.5%Turnover Rate8.1%
27.3%Free Throw Rate19.4%
43.6%3-Point Rate45.2%
0.79Assist / Turnover4.20
Game Summary
Chicago State won by 19 points. The game played at approximately 61.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.