
Hofstra
24-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
82.4%Hofstra
17.6%Northeastern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHofstra -9.5
PROJECTED TOTAL150.7
MODEL MONEYLINEHofstra -468

Northeastern
8-23MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHofstra 80
Projected Total150.7
Projected ScoreNortheastern 71
Team Comparison
59.3MMH Power Index40.9
114.0Offensive Efficiency107.1
100.9Defensive Efficiency115.7
13.1Net Efficiency-8.6
-2.9Strength of Schedule2.7
14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.0
66.2Tempo69.9
52.2%Effective FG%52.7%
16.1%Turnover Rate16.4%
35.0%Offensive Rebound %27.0%
32.0%Free Throw Rate29.9%
8.7Average Margin-6.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Hofstra HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY82.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHofstra holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.3–40.9), offensive efficiency (114.0–107.1), defensive efficiency (100.9–115.7), net efficiency (13.1–-8.6).
Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.9), shooting efficiency (52.7–52.2).