
Utah Valley
25-9GAME THAT MATTERSAT
63.4%Utah Valley
36.6%UT Arlington
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUtah Valley -3.0
PROJECTED TOTAL142.8
MODEL MONEYLINEUtah Valley -173

UT Arlington
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUtah Valley 73
Projected Total142.8
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 70
Team Comparison
59.1MMH Power Index49.6
113.4Offensive Efficiency102.7
97.3Defensive Efficiency97.9
16.1Net Efficiency4.8
-3.3Strength of Schedule-0.8
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.9
70.6Tempo68.1
56.0%Effective FG%48.5%
19.9%Turnover Rate20.4%
36.2%Offensive Rebound %36.0%
37.3%Free Throw Rate43.7%
11.4Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Utah Valley HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUtah Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–49.6), offensive efficiency (113.4–102.7), defensive efficiency (97.3–97.9), net efficiency (16.1–4.8).
UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-0.8–-3.3), free throw rate (43.7–37.3).