
Longwood
16-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.2%Longwood
63.8%Charleston Southern
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCharleston Southern -4.5
PROJECTED TOTAL161.5
MODEL MONEYLINECharleston Southern -176

Charleston Southern
15-17MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLongwood 79
Projected Total161.5
Projected ScoreCharleston Southern 83
Team Comparison
47MMH Power Index47.5
108.1Offensive Efficiency110.1
103.0Defensive Efficiency105.7
5.1Net Efficiency4.4
-6.4Strength of Schedule-3.5
2.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-2.8
71.9Tempo75.8
51.4%Effective FG%55.3%
19.3%Turnover Rate18.4%
35.4%Offensive Rebound %30.6%
42.0%Free Throw Rate30.8%
3.6Average Margin3.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Longwood HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLongwood holds the advantage in defensive efficiency (103.0–105.7), net efficiency (5.1–4.4), recent form (2.3–-2.8), offensive rebounding (35.4–30.6).
Charleston Southern COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (47.5–47.0), offensive efficiency (110.1–108.1), strength of schedule (-3.5–-6.4).