UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

80.2%UT Rio Grande Valley

19.8%SE Louisiana

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -7.7

PROJECTED TOTAL137.1

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -405

SE Louisiana

9-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 72

Projected Total137.1

Projected ScoreSE Louisiana 65

Team Comparison

UT Rio Grande ValleyMetricSE Louisiana

55.8MMH Power Index38.7

112.6Offensive Efficiency98.4

103.1Defensive Efficiency106.4

9.5Net Efficiency-8.0

-1.9Strength of Schedule0.2

12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.9

67.4Tempo63.9

55.7%Effective FG%47.0%

17.9%Turnover Rate18.5%

29.2%Offensive Rebound %29.4%

29.6%Free Throw Rate38.9%

6.4Average Margin-5.1

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–38.7), offensive efficiency (112.6–98.4), defensive efficiency (103.1–106.4), net efficiency (9.5–-8.0).

SE Louisiana COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-1.9), offensive rebounding (29.4–29.2), free throw rate (38.9–29.6).

Final

UT Rio Grande Valley

96—75

SE Louisiana

UT Rio Grande Valley by 21 • 63.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UT Rio Grande ValleyTEAM STATSE Louisiana

31-50FG24-53

62.0%FG%45.0%

16-283PT4-17

57.0%3PT%24.0%

18-19FT23-35

95.0%FT%66.0%

24Rebounds28

4Offensive Rebounds13

22Assists12

10Turnovers6

4Steals5

2Blocks3

21Fouls13

Player Box Score

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Koree Cotton	G	22	6-9	4-6	2-2	0	2	2	0	18
Filip Brankovic	F	17	6-7	2-3	4-4	3	3	0	0	18
Marvin McGhee III	G	28	5-11	5-8	2-3	2	0	0	0	17
Dane Christensen	F	13	4-4	2-2	2-2	3	2	0	0	12
Jaylen Washington	G	22	3-4	0-0	4-4	3	4	1	0	10
Kwo Agwa	F	12	3-3	0-0	2-2	1	4	0	0	8
Jalen Ricks	G	11	2-4	2-4	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Zae Blake	G	26	2-4	1-3	0-0	7	1	0	0	5
Demarris Winters	G	9	0-0	0-0	2-2	1	1	0	0	2
Always Wright	G	18	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	3	0	0	0
Julien Gomez	G	14	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Marshal Destremau	F	8	0-3	0-1	0-0	0	1	1	2	0

SE Louisiana

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Isaiah Gaines	F	31	8-14	1-2	7-10	7	2	0	1	24
Peter Hemschemeier	G	20	3-8	3-8	2-2	1	1	0	0	11
Jeremy Elyzee	F	25	4-6	0-1	2-4	3	0	0	1	10
CJ Booker	PG	35	3-6	0-1	2-2	1	7	4	0	8
Ethan Pickett	G	16	1-4	0-0	5-8	3	0	1	0	7
Makhi Myles	F	20	2-5	0-2	0-0	1	1	0	1	4
Jaiden Lawrence	G	19	0-1	0-0	4-4	2	0	0	0	4
Garrett Shoemaker	F	13	1-1	0-0	1-4	3	0	0	0	3
Jalen Forrest	G	11	1-4	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Ahmed Essahaty	G	2	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Ubong-Abasi Etim	C	6	0-0	0-0	0-1	2	1	0	0	0
Kyle Edison	G	2	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

63.8Possessions63.8

150.5Offensive Efficiency117.6

117.6Defensive Efficiency150.5

32.9Net Efficiency-32.9

78.0%Effective FG%49.1%

81.3%True Shooting %53.9%

15.4%Turnover Rate9.6%

38.0%Free Throw Rate66.0%

56.0%3-Point Rate32.1%

2.20Assist / Turnover2.00

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 21 points. The game played at approximately 63.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.