West Virginia logo

West Virginia

21-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
29.6%West Virginia
70.4%TCU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -6.1
PROJECTED TOTAL143.2
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -238
TCU logo

TCU

23-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWest Virginia 69
Projected Total143.2
Projected ScoreTCU 75

Team Comparison

56.5MMH Power Index59.7
108.2Offensive Efficiency110.2
100.7Defensive Efficiency102.7
7.5Net Efficiency7.5
2.9Strength of Schedule4.6
1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
65.3Tempo70.2
51.5%Effective FG%50.5%
16.8%Turnover Rate15.3%
30.5%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
35.6%Free Throw Rate38.3%
4.9Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

TCU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY70.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
82
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–56.5), offensive efficiency (110.2–108.2), strength of schedule (4.6–2.9), recent form (2.2–1.8).
West Virginia COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–102.7), shooting efficiency (51.5–50.5).
Final
West Virginia logo
West Virginia
5460
TCU logo
TCU
TCU by 660.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

West VirginiaTEAM STATTCU
20-49FG18-53
41.0%FG%34.0%
5-213PT6-16
24.0%3PT%38.0%
9-12FT18-27
75.0%FT%67.0%
28Rebounds39
9Offensive Rebounds19
12Assists13
16Turnovers12
7Steals11
8Blocks2
16Fouls9

Player Box Score

West Virginia
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Honor HuffG384-102-73-343000013
Brenen LorientF334-80-32-231020010
Chance MooreG263-70-03-48024009
Treysen EaglestaffF323-72-50-03200008
Jasper FloydG332-51-30-03540005
DJ ThomasF162-40-11-11002005
Harlan ObiohaC141-50-00-23000002
Amir JenkinsG81-30-20-00110002
TCU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Liutauras LeleviciusG274-73-43-321100014
Xavier EdmondsF264-81-25-10131110014
David PunchF324-80-04-874410012
Brock HardingG364-101-22-226300011
Micah RobinsonF292-61-22-24110007
Jayden PierreG300-60-32-20000002
Tanner ToolsonG170-80-30-02010000
Vianney SalatchoumC30-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

60.3Possessions60.3
89.6Offensive Efficiency99.5
99.5Defensive Efficiency89.6
-10.0Net Efficiency10.0
45.9%Effective FG%39.6%
49.4%True Shooting %45.6%
25.9%Turnover Rate20.4%
24.5%Free Throw Rate50.9%
42.9%3-Point Rate30.2%
0.75Assist / Turnover1.08
Game Summary
TCU won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 60.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.