North Alabama

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.4%North Alabama

87.6%Lipscomb

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADLipscomb -13.9

PROJECTED TOTAL150.6

MODEL MONEYLINELipscomb -706

Lipscomb

18-13

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNorth Alabama 68

Projected Total150.6

Projected ScoreLipscomb 82

Team Comparison

North AlabamaMetricLipscomb

34.9MMH Power Index47.9

104.4Offensive Efficiency111.3

116.7Defensive Efficiency107.6

-12.3Net Efficiency3.7

-1.2Strength of Schedule-2.5

-16.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.0

66.5Tempo68.8

48.9%Effective FG%54.8%

17.2%Turnover Rate16.0%

31.5%Offensive Rebound %25.9%

39.1%Free Throw Rate26.5%

-8.2Average Margin2.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Lipscomb HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.6%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMLipscomb holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (47.9–34.9), offensive efficiency (111.3–104.4), defensive efficiency (107.6–116.7), net efficiency (3.7–-12.3).

North Alabama COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.2–-2.5), offensive rebounding (31.5–25.9), free throw rate (39.1–26.5).

Final

North Alabama

51—73

Lipscomb

Lipscomb by 22 • 62.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

North AlabamaTEAM STATLipscomb

22-63FG29-50

35.0%FG%58.0%

1-163PT10-25

6.0%3PT%40.0%

6-10FT5-9

60.0%FT%56.0%

34Rebounds33

15Offensive Rebounds4

2Assists18

11Turnovers11

6Steals6

—Blocks5

7Fouls14

Player Box Score

North Alabama

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Kevin de Kovachich	G	37	7-18	1-5	0-0	4	1	1	15
Corneilous Williams	F	31	5-11	0-0	2-4	10	0	0	12
Donte Bacchus	F	38	4-12	0-1	3-5	6	0	0	11
Braylon Patton	G	22	3-8	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	6
Dallas Howell	F	36	2-9	0-7	1-1	5	0	3	5
King Walker	G	6	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	2
Cortez Graham-Howard	G	21	0-4	0-2	0-0	3	1	1	0
Jamal Albritton	C	9	0-0	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	0

Lipscomb

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ross Candelino	G	29	5-7	5-6	1-2	6	0	0	0	16
Grant Asman	F	34	6-8	0-2	0-2	8	1	1	3	12
Titas Sargiunas	F	26	4-9	1-4	3-4	3	4	1	0	12
Kellan Boylan	F	15	4-5	1-2	1-1	4	0	0	1	10
Mateo Esmeraldo	G	27	3-4	1-2	0-0	3	8	3	0	7
Charlie Williams	C	18	2-7	1-5	0-0	0	3	0	0	5
Ethan Duncan	G	15	2-2	0-0	0-0	2	0	1	0	4
Kennedy Okpara	F	11	2-5	0-3	0-0	2	0	0	0	4
Or Ashkenazi	F	19	1-2	1-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	3
Cole Middleton	F	5	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	1	0
Luke Carter	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

62.6Possessions62.6

81.5Offensive Efficiency116.6

116.6Defensive Efficiency81.5

-35.1Net Efficiency35.1

35.7%Effective FG%68.0%

37.6%True Shooting %67.3%

17.3%Turnover Rate18.0%

15.9%Free Throw Rate18.0%

25.4%3-Point Rate50.0%

0.18Assist / Turnover1.64

Game Summary

Lipscomb won by 22 points. The game played at approximately 62.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.