Texas A&M

20-12

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

27.6%Texas A&M

72.4%Oklahoma

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADOklahoma -5.9

PROJECTED TOTAL161.7

MODEL MONEYLINEOklahoma -262

Oklahoma

21-16

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 78

Projected Total161.7

Projected ScoreOklahoma 84

Team Comparison

Texas A&MMetricOklahoma

58MMH Power Index62.1

116.1Offensive Efficiency119.5

108.4Defensive Efficiency111.6

7.7Net Efficiency7.9

4.8Strength of Schedule3.2

-7.2Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

69.1Tempo69.4

53.5%Effective FG%55.1%

14.8%Turnover Rate14.4%

31.7%Offensive Rebound %32.4%

37.5%Free Throw Rate36.2%

5.3Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Oklahoma HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY72.4%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOklahoma holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.1–58.0), offensive efficiency (119.5–116.1), net efficiency (7.9–7.7), recent form (12.3–-7.2).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–111.6), strength of schedule (4.8–3.2), free throw rate (37.5–36.2).

Final

Texas A&M

75—71

Oklahoma

Texas A&M by 4 • 62.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Texas A&MTEAM STATOklahoma

27-62FG20-61

44.0%FG%33.0%

10-253PT11-30

40.0%3PT%37.0%

11-20FT20-24

55.0%FT%83.0%

39Rebounds44

14Offensive Rebounds18

14Assists11

5Turnovers8

6Steals3

4Blocks5

20Fouls19

Player Box Score

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Rashaun Agee	F	30	7-13	2-4	2-2	7	1	1	0	18
Rylan Griffen	G	31	5-10	3-6	1-2	5	1	3	2	14
Zach Clemence	F	24	3-8	1-5	2-3	5	4	0	2	9
Marcus Hill	G	27	3-9	0-1	2-2	5	2	0	0	8
Pop Isaacs	G	15	2-3	2-2	0-0	2	0	0	0	6
Jacari Lane	G	19	1-3	0-2	3-3	1	3	0	0	5
Rubén Dominguez	G	18	2-7	1-2	0-0	2	1	1	0	5
Josh Holloway	G	18	2-3	1-1	0-4	2	0	1	0	5
Ali Dibba	G	11	2-5	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	4
Jamie Vinson	F	2	0-1	0-1	1-2	1	0	0	0	1
Federiko Federiko	F	5	0-0	0-0	0-2	1	1	0	0	0

Oklahoma

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Dayton Forsythe	G	30	4-10	2-6	4-4	1	6	1	0	14
Mohamed Wague	F	25	3-6	0-1	6-8	13	0	1	2	12
Derrion Reid	F	23	2-6	1-3	6-8	5	1	0	1	11
Xzayvier Brown	G	29	4-11	2-4	0-0	1	2	0	0	10
Nijel Pack	G	29	2-9	2-5	0-0	4	1	0	1	6
Jadon Jones	G	20	2-4	2-4	0-0	7	1	1	1	6
Kuol Atak	F	10	2-6	2-6	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Tae Davis	F	26	1-8	0-0	2-2	10	0	0	0	4
Kirill Elatontsev	C	8	0-1	0-1	2-2	0	0	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

62.5Possessions62.5

120.0Offensive Efficiency113.6

113.6Defensive Efficiency120.0

6.4Net Efficiency-6.4

51.6%Effective FG%41.8%

52.4%True Shooting %49.0%

8.0%Turnover Rate12.8%

32.3%Free Throw Rate39.3%

40.3%3-Point Rate49.2%

2.80Assist / Turnover1.38

Game Summary

Texas A&M won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 62.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Effective FG%, Free Throw Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.