
UAB
20-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.4%UAB
37.6%Memphis
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUAB -2.2
PROJECTED TOTAL155.0
MODEL MONEYLINEUAB -166

Memphis
13-19MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUAB 79
Projected Total155.0
Projected ScoreMemphis 76
Team Comparison
56.9MMH Power Index47.8
110.5Offensive Efficiency104.6
102.9Defensive Efficiency106.5
7.6Net Efficiency-1.9
0.4Strength of Schedule4.4
2.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-11.1
71.7Tempo71.9
48.8%Effective FG%48.7%
12.4%Turnover Rate18.9%
32.7%Offensive Rebound %35.0%
36.9%Free Throw Rate35.1%
5.4Average Margin-1.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
UAB HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUAB holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.9–47.8), offensive efficiency (110.5–104.6), defensive efficiency (102.9–106.5), net efficiency (7.6–-1.9).
Memphis COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (4.4–0.4), offensive rebounding (35.0–32.7).