Iona logo

Iona

18-14
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
22.0%Iona
78.0%Merrimack
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -8.1
PROJECTED TOTAL140.8
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -355
Merrimack logo

Merrimack

23-11
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIona 66
Projected Total140.8
Projected ScoreMerrimack 74

Team Comparison

46.9MMH Power Index53.7
105.8Offensive Efficiency106.4
104.8Defensive Efficiency103.2
1.0Net Efficiency3.2
-1.6Strength of Schedule0.7
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency12.9
69.8Tempo64.4
51.9%Effective FG%49.3%
17.2%Turnover Rate14.8%
27.4%Offensive Rebound %24.7%
29.9%Free Throw Rate39.5%
0.7Average Margin2.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY78.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–46.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–105.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–104.8), net efficiency (3.2–1.0).
Iona COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (51.9–49.3), offensive rebounding (27.4–24.7).
Final
Iona logo
Iona
8688
Merrimack logo
Merrimack
Merrimack by 273.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

IonaTEAM STATMerrimack
30-68FG26-63
44.0%FG%41.0%
14-343PT11-33
41.0%3PT%33.0%
12-16FT25-28
75.0%FT%89.0%
45Rebounds32
14Offensive Rebounds6
17Assists18
12Turnovers4
2Steals9
4Blocks9
19Fouls15

Player Box Score

Iona
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
CJ AnthonyG449-155-92-255000025
Luke JungersF347-145-121-231010020
Kosy AkametuG456-150-04-645100016
Lamin SaballyF334-70-05-6114000013
Toby HarrisF404-94-80-071100012
Denver AnglinG280-50-50-03102000
Alliou FallF220-30-00-07001000
Khalil BadruG20-00-00-00000000
Chase CormierG20-00-00-00000000
Merrimack
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Kevair KennedyG506-161-27-867510020
Ernest SheltonG464-133-107-860100018
Tye DorsetG505-92-43-435100015
Todd BrognaF465-112-81-195050013
Andrés MarreroG403-113-93-300200012
KC UgwuakaziF153-30-04-441030010
Dylan VeilletteF30-00-00-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

73.9Possessions73.9
116.4Offensive Efficiency119.1
119.1Defensive Efficiency116.4
-2.7Net Efficiency2.7
54.4%Effective FG%50.0%
56.9%True Shooting %57.7%
16.3%Turnover Rate5.4%
23.5%Free Throw Rate44.4%
50.0%3-Point Rate52.4%
1.42Assist / Turnover4.50
Game Summary
Merrimack won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 73.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.