
Rice
13-18GAME THAT MATTERSAT
39.7%Rice
60.3%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulane -3.1
PROJECTED TOTAL149.8
MODEL MONEYLINETulane -152

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRice 73
Projected Total149.8
Projected ScoreTulane 76
Team Comparison
45.1MMH Power Index44.3
108.3Offensive Efficiency105.3
109.2Defensive Efficiency109.9
-0.9Net Efficiency-4.6
-2.2Strength of Schedule2.7
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
68.3Tempo68.7
49.7%Effective FG%49.6%
17.8%Turnover Rate15.6%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
34.7%Free Throw Rate44.8%
-0.6Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Rice HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY60.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMRice holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.1–44.3), offensive efficiency (108.3–105.3), defensive efficiency (109.2–109.9), net efficiency (-0.9–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-2.2), ball security (15.6–17.8), free throw rate (44.8–34.7).