
Fairfield
21-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
35.2%Fairfield
64.8%Quinnipiac
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -4.9
PROJECTED TOTAL147.7
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -184

Quinnipiac
19-13MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreFairfield 71
Projected Total147.7
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 76
Team Comparison
50.1MMH Power Index51
109.6Offensive Efficiency106.8
105.4Defensive Efficiency102.1
4.2Net Efficiency4.7
-3.4Strength of Schedule-2.3
3.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.2
67.8Tempo70.5
49.1%Effective FG%48.9%
15.0%Turnover Rate15.6%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %34.1%
28.4%Free Throw Rate34.1%
2.8Average Margin3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY64.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–50.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–105.4), net efficiency (4.7–4.2), strength of schedule (-2.3–-3.4).
Fairfield COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (109.6–106.8), recent form (3.3–2.2), shooting efficiency (49.1–48.9).