
Niagara
8-22GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.9%Niagara
44.1%Rider
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNiagara -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL136.2
MODEL MONEYLINENiagara -127

Rider
4-25MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNiagara 69
Projected Total136.2
Projected ScoreRider 68
Team Comparison
35.8MMH Power Index29.1
100.8Offensive Efficiency96.3
112.4Defensive Efficiency115.3
-11.6Net Efficiency-19.0
-0.8Strength of Schedule-0.9
-5.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-17.7
63.4Tempo65.9
50.9%Effective FG%43.4%
18.8%Turnover Rate17.1%
24.9%Offensive Rebound %32.8%
27.3%Free Throw Rate31.5%
-7.4Average Margin-12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Niagara HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNiagara holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (35.8–29.1), offensive efficiency (100.8–96.3), defensive efficiency (112.4–115.3), net efficiency (-11.6–-19.0).
Rider COUNTERS WITHball security (17.1–18.8), offensive rebounding (32.8–24.9), free throw rate (31.5–27.3).