UTSA

5-25

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

1.3%UTSA

98.7%Tulsa

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTulsa -28.7

PROJECTED TOTAL157.5

MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -7592

Tulsa

30-8

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreUTSA 64

Projected Total157.5

Projected ScoreTulsa 93

Team Comparison

UTSAMetricTulsa

30.5MMH Power Index64.8

99.0Offensive Efficiency121.1

115.0Defensive Efficiency104.8

-16.0Net Efficiency16.3

-1.2Strength of Schedule0.0

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency10.3

70.2Tempo70.2

45.9%Effective FG%55.4%

17.0%Turnover Rate15.4%

30.9%Offensive Rebound %33.8%

29.9%Free Throw Rate42.4%

-11.3Average Margin11.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Tulsa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY98.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

11–0

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–30.5), offensive efficiency (121.1–99.0), defensive efficiency (104.8–115.0), net efficiency (16.3–-16.0).

Final

UTSA

74—100

Tulsa

Tulsa by 26 • 71.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

UTSATEAM STATTulsa

27-61FG34-63

44.0%FG%54.0%

11-263PT12-29

42.0%3PT%41.0%

9-11FT20-25

82.0%FT%80.0%

25Rebounds40

5Offensive Rebounds11

13Assists23

11Turnovers7

4Steals9

2Blocks2

18Fouls11

Player Box Score

UTSA

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jamir Simpson	G	36	7-17	2-7	4-4	5	3	0	0	20
Dorian Hayes	G	31	7-11	4-7	1-1	2	3	1	0	19
Daniel Akitoby	F	15	4-6	1-1	1-2	1	0	1	0	10
Brent Moss	G	32	3-8	2-4	0-0	2	3	1	1	8
Baboucarr Njie	F	30	3-9	0-1	2-2	4	1	0	0	8
Matheo Coffi	F	30	2-5	2-5	0-0	4	2	0	1	6
Kaidon Rayfield	F	18	1-4	0-1	1-2	2	1	1	0	3
LJ Brown	G	8	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Tulsa

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
David Green	F	28	9-13	3-4	6-8	3	2	2	0	27
Ade Popoola	G	31	8-15	7-13	3-4	10	1	5	1	26
Tylen Riley	G	28	4-8	0-0	5-6	3	6	1	0	13
Romad Dean	F	22	4-5	0-1	3-3	6	2	1	0	11
Miles Barnstable	G	27	3-9	1-6	0-0	5	2	0	0	7
Jaylen Lawal	G	15	1-6	0-3	3-4	1	4	0	0	5
Tyler Behrend	F	25	2-3	0-0	0-0	5	3	0	0	4
Leon Sifferlin	G	3	1-2	1-2	0-0	0	0	0	0	3
Ian Smikle	F	12	1-1	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	1	2
KJ Martin Jr.	F	9	1-1	0-0	0-0	2	1	0	0	2

Advanced Game Stats

71.6Possessions71.6

103.4Offensive Efficiency139.7

139.7Defensive Efficiency103.4

-36.3Net Efficiency36.3

53.3%Effective FG%63.5%

55.9%True Shooting %66.8%

15.2%Turnover Rate9.9%

18.0%Free Throw Rate39.7%

42.6%3-Point Rate46.0%

1.18Assist / Turnover3.29

Game Summary

Tulsa won by 26 points. The game played at approximately 71.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.