
UT Rio Grande Valley
19-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
15.1%UT Rio Grande Valley
84.9%McNeese
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMcNeese -11.6
PROJECTED TOTAL144.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMcNeese -562

McNeese
27-6MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 66
Projected Total144.4
Projected ScoreMcNeese 78
Team Comparison
55.8MMH Power Index66.7
112.6Offensive Efficiency117.4
103.1Defensive Efficiency98.3
9.5Net Efficiency19.1
-1.9Strength of Schedule-1.6
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency15.5
67.4Tempo66.0
55.7%Effective FG%52.2%
17.9%Turnover Rate13.9%
29.2%Offensive Rebound %37.1%
29.6%Free Throw Rate37.7%
6.4Average Margin12.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
McNeese HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY84.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMcNeese holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (66.7–55.8), offensive efficiency (117.4–112.6), defensive efficiency (98.3–103.1), net efficiency (19.1–9.5).
UT Rio Grande Valley COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (55.7–52.2).