LSU logo

LSU

15-17
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
28.2%LSU
71.8%Texas A&M
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -7.0
PROJECTED TOTAL161.4
MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -255
Texas A&M logo

Texas A&M

20-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreLSU 77
Projected Total161.4
Projected ScoreTexas A&M 84

Team Comparison

54.2MMH Power Index58
115.5Offensive Efficiency116.1
111.3Defensive Efficiency108.4
4.2Net Efficiency7.7
4.5Strength of Schedule4.8
-12.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2
70.5Tempo69.1
53.4%Effective FG%53.5%
15.6%Turnover Rate14.8%
33.2%Offensive Rebound %31.7%
41.9%Free Throw Rate37.5%
2.9Average Margin5.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Texas A&M HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas A&M holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.0–54.2), offensive efficiency (116.1–115.5), defensive efficiency (108.4–111.3), net efficiency (7.7–4.2).
LSU COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–31.7), free throw rate (41.9–37.5).
Final
LSU logo
LSU
57—68
Texas A&M logo
Texas A&M
Texas A&M by 11 • 66.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

LSUTEAM STATTexas A&M
17-47FG26-61
36.0%FG%43.0%
7-293PT7-22
24.0%3PT%32.0%
16-18FT9-21
89.0%FT%43.0%
33Rebounds38
6Offensive Rebounds14
14Assists15
18Turnovers9
4Steals8
5Blocks1
21Fouls16

Player Box Score

LSU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cam CarterGuard355-133-63-454020016
Jordan SearsGuard301-81-78-845100011
Dji BaileyGuard293-61-30-05120007
Curtis Givens IIIG232-72-70-03200006
Robert Miller IIIF233-30-00-03011006
Daimion CollinsF171-30-12-21101004
Mike WilliamsG61-50-42-21000004
Derek FountainForward241-20-11-26100003
Corey ChestF130-00-00-03001000
Texas A&M
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Zhuric PhelpsGuard306-131-30-266100013
Wade Taylor IVGuard243-131-55-644200012
Henry Coleman IIIForward285-70-00-221100010
CJ WilcherGuard153-73-60-02000009
Solomon WashingtonF193-61-20-17220007
Andersson GarciaForward232-20-01-27011005
Jace CarterNot Available162-41-30-00110005
Pharrel PayneF131-20-02-72000004
Manny ObasekiGuard121-10-01-11100003
Hayden HefnerGuard200-60-30-02000000

Advanced Game Stats

66.8Possessions66.8
85.3Offensive Efficiency101.8
101.8Defensive Efficiency85.3
-16.5Net Efficiency16.5
43.6%Effective FG%48.4%
51.3%True Shooting %47.9%
26.6%Turnover Rate13.6%
38.3%Free Throw Rate34.4%
61.7%3-Point Rate36.1%
0.78Assist / Turnover1.67
Game Summary
Texas A&M won by 11 points. The game played at approximately 66.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.