
Queens University
21-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
55.6%Queens University
44.4%Eastern Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADEastern Kentucky -0.1
PROJECTED TOTAL170.9
MODEL MONEYLINEQueens University -125

Eastern Kentucky
11-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQueens University 85
Projected Total170.9
Projected ScoreEastern Kentucky 85
Team Comparison
51.7MMH Power Index45.1
118.4Offensive Efficiency113.3
117.0Defensive Efficiency115.5
1.4Net Efficiency-2.2
0.1Strength of Schedule-1.1
1.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.7
71.4Tempo70.9
56.6%Effective FG%52.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate16.6%
29.6%Offensive Rebound %33.6%
37.6%Free Throw Rate31.7%
0.9Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Queens University HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY55.6%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQueens University holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.7–45.1), offensive efficiency (118.4–113.3), net efficiency (1.4–-2.2), strength of schedule (0.1–-1.1).
Eastern Kentucky COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (115.5–117.0), offensive rebounding (33.6–29.6).