
Tulsa
30-8GAME THAT MATTERSAT
85.5%Tulsa
14.5%Tulane
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTulsa -10.8
PROJECTED TOTAL156.0
MODEL MONEYLINETulsa -590

Tulane
18-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTulsa 83
Projected Total156.0
Projected ScoreTulane 73
Team Comparison
64.8MMH Power Index44.3
121.1Offensive Efficiency105.3
104.8Defensive Efficiency109.9
16.3Net Efficiency-4.6
0.0Strength of Schedule2.7
10.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.3
70.2Tempo68.7
55.4%Effective FG%49.6%
15.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
33.8%Offensive Rebound %22.8%
42.4%Free Throw Rate44.8%
11.5Average Margin-3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tulsa HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTulsa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.8–44.3), offensive efficiency (121.1–105.3), defensive efficiency (104.8–109.9), net efficiency (16.3–-4.6).
Tulane COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–0.0), free throw rate (44.8–42.4).