
UNLV
18-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
21.6%UNLV
78.4%Grand Canyon
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADGrand Canyon -9.7
PROJECTED TOTAL153.1
MODEL MONEYLINEGrand Canyon -363

Grand Canyon
20-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUNLV 72
Projected Total153.1
Projected ScoreGrand Canyon 81
Team Comparison
52.8MMH Power Index59.8
111.0Offensive Efficiency109.2
109.6Defensive Efficiency99.1
1.4Net Efficiency10.1
2.7Strength of Schedule2.0
1.1Last 10 Net Efficiency9.7
71.4Tempo69.3
53.7%Effective FG%52.1%
17.2%Turnover Rate17.6%
30.8%Offensive Rebound %31.2%
41.6%Free Throw Rate41.0%
1.0Average Margin7.0
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Grand Canyon HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY78.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrand Canyon holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.8–52.8), defensive efficiency (99.1–109.6), net efficiency (10.1–1.4), recent form (9.7–1.1).
UNLV COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (111.0–109.2), strength of schedule (2.7–2.0), shooting efficiency (53.7–52.1).