SMU

20-14

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

54.0%SMU

46.0%California

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCalifornia -0.3

PROJECTED TOTAL160.3

MODEL MONEYLINESMU -117

California

22-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreSMU 80

Projected Total160.3

Projected ScoreCalifornia 80

Team Comparison

SMUMetricCalifornia

62.5MMH Power Index56.5

118.2Offensive Efficiency111.8

109.6Defensive Efficiency104.8

8.6Net Efficiency7.0

7.0Strength of Schedule2.8

-1.3Last 10 Net Efficiency1.8

71.1Tempo69.9

55.7%Effective FG%52.6%

15.7%Turnover Rate14.9%

35.0%Offensive Rebound %26.6%

31.3%Free Throw Rate36.8%

6.1Average Margin4.9

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

SMU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY54.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMSMU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.5–56.5), offensive efficiency (118.2–111.8), net efficiency (8.6–7.0), strength of schedule (7.0–2.8).

California COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (104.8–109.6), recent form (1.8–-1.3), ball security (14.9–15.7).

Final

SMU

69—73

California

California by 4 • 69.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

SMUTEAM STATCalifornia

25-55FG26-65

45.0%FG%40.0%

8-213PT9-32

38.0%3PT%28.0%

11-26FT12-15

42.0%FT%80.0%

44Rebounds33

13Offensive Rebounds9

13Assists17

14Turnovers8

4Steals7

3Blocks3

15Fouls19

Player Box Score

SMU

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Boopie Miller	G	38	6-12	2-2	1-2	6	4	0	0	15
Corey Washington	F	33	4-9	3-6	4-8	9	1	1	0	15
Jaron Pierre Jr.	G	34	4-11	1-5	5-8	4	3	0	1	14
Samet Yigitoglu	C	32	5-6	0-0	1-6	8	1	1	0	11
Jermaine O'Neal Jr.	F	18	2-5	1-3	0-0	1	0	1	1	5
B.J. Edwards	G	17	2-5	1-2	0-0	4	3	1	0	5
Jaden Toombs	C	22	1-5	0-2	0-2	8	1	0	1	2
Sam Walters	F	6	1-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	0	0	2

California

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Justin Pippen	G	34	8-19	2-10	6-7	4	5	3	1	24
Chris Bell	F	34	7-12	4-8	2-2	3	1	2	0	20
John Camden	F	33	5-11	2-7	2-2	3	3	0	0	14
Lee Dort	F	22	3-5	0-0	1-2	10	2	1	1	7
Milos Ilic	C	15	1-3	1-2	0-0	2	1	0	0	3
Dai Dai Ames	G	28	1-10	0-4	0-0	3	2	1	1	2
Mantas Kocanas	C	3	1-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Sammie Yeanay	F	7	0-1	0-0	1-2	2	1	0	0	1
Semetri Carr	G	18	0-1	0-0	0-0	3	2	0	0	0
Nolan Dorsey	G	6	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

69.8Possessions69.8

98.9Offensive Efficiency104.6

104.6Defensive Efficiency98.9

-5.7Net Efficiency5.7

52.7%Effective FG%46.9%

51.2%True Shooting %50.6%

20.5%Turnover Rate11.2%

47.3%Free Throw Rate23.1%

38.2%3-Point Rate49.2%

0.93Assist / Turnover2.13

Game Summary

California won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 69.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.