New Hampshire

9-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

41.8%New Hampshire

58.2%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBinghamton -2.6

PROJECTED TOTAL140.6

MODEL MONEYLINEBinghamton -139

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNew Hampshire 69

Projected Total140.6

Projected ScoreBinghamton 72

Team Comparison

New HampshireMetricBinghamton

34MMH Power Index32.4

99.6Offensive Efficiency102.2

107.5Defensive Efficiency112.3

-7.9Net Efficiency-10.1

-3.4Strength of Schedule-6.0

-17.6Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

69.4Tempo64.2

47.6%Effective FG%51.3%

16.1%Turnover Rate18.5%

26.7%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

29.4%Free Throw Rate42.8%

-5.5Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

New Hampshire HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY58.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–4

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNew Hampshire holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (34.0–32.4), defensive efficiency (107.5–112.3), net efficiency (-7.9–-10.1), strength of schedule (-3.4–-6.0).

Binghamton COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (102.2–99.6), recent form (-6.2–-17.6), shooting efficiency (51.3–47.6).

Final

New Hampshire

61—65

Binghamton

Binghamton by 4 • 62.7 estimated possessions

Team Stats

New HampshireTEAM STATBinghamton

21-62FG26-49

34.0%FG%53.0%

12-363PT5-14

33.0%3PT%36.0%

7-13FT8-11

54.0%FT%73.0%

36Rebounds33

14Offensive Rebounds4

12Assists13

9Turnovers12

6Steals3

1Blocks4

11Fouls14

Player Box Score

New Hampshire

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Davide Poser	F	28	8-14	8-14	0-0	2	2	0	0	24
Tyler Bike	G	31	3-11	3-10	1-2	1	3	2	0	10
Belal El Shakery	F	29	3-11	0-1	0-2	11	1	0	0	6
Jack Graham	G	21	2-8	1-5	1-2	2	1	0	1	6
Comeh Emuobor	G	16	2-7	0-0	2-2	4	0	1	0	6
John Squire	F	29	2-3	0-0	1-3	4	2	3	0	5
KiJan Robinson	G	26	1-7	0-5	2-2	1	3	0	0	4
R.J. Kennedy	G	16	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	0	0	0	0
Jon O'Neill	F	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	2	0	0	0	0

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jeremiah Quigley	G	40	7-12	0-0	3-4	5	6	1	0	17
Zyier Beverly	F	33	6-11	0-1	2-4	6	0	1	3	14
Jake Blackburn	G	13	4-9	3-8	0-0	2	0	1	0	11
Jackson Benigni	G	38	3-5	1-3	3-3	3	3	0	0	10
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	40	3-7	1-2	0-0	8	2	0	0	7
Stephan Snagg	F	36	3-5	0-0	0-0	7	2	0	1	6

Advanced Game Stats

62.7Possessions62.7

97.3Offensive Efficiency103.7

103.7Defensive Efficiency97.3

-6.4Net Efficiency6.4

43.5%Effective FG%58.2%

44.7%True Shooting %59.9%

14.2%Turnover Rate19.3%

21.0%Free Throw Rate22.4%

58.1%3-Point Rate28.6%

1.33Assist / Turnover1.08

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 4 points. The game played at approximately 62.7 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in True Shooting %, Effective FG%, Net Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.