Bryant logo

Bryant

9-22
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
3.6%Bryant
96.4%UMBC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUMBC -21.2
PROJECTED TOTAL137.2
MODEL MONEYLINEUMBC -2678
UMBC logo

UMBC

24-8
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreBryant 58
Projected Total137.2
Projected ScoreUMBC 79

Team Comparison

34.1MMH Power Index59.1
98.6Offensive Efficiency113.0
110.2Defensive Efficiency99.0
-11.6Net Efficiency14.0
-1.3Strength of Schedule-5.6
-10.0Last 10 Net Efficiency24.7
65.8Tempo65.5
48.0%Effective FG%54.3%
20.0%Turnover Rate14.3%
28.1%Offensive Rebound %25.2%
31.2%Free Throw Rate34.1%
-7.6Average Margin9.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

UMBC HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY96.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUMBC holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.1–34.1), offensive efficiency (113.0–98.6), defensive efficiency (99.0–110.2), net efficiency (14.0–-11.6).
Bryant COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.3–-5.6), offensive rebounding (28.1–25.2).
Final
Bryant logo
Bryant
5870
UMBC logo
UMBC
UMBC by 1263.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

BryantTEAM STATUMBC
18-51FG24-51
35.0%FG%47.0%
8-233PT5-19
35.0%3PT%26.0%
14-20FT17-19
70.0%FT%89.0%
23Rebounds40
6Offensive Rebounds10
8Assists6
10Turnovers12
6Steals3
1Blocks4
16Fouls15

Player Box Score

Bryant
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Keegan HarveyF385-102-37-1041000019
Timofei RudovskiiF354-82-64-762010014
Aaron Davis IIIF252-102-73-32020009
Ty TabalesG323-80-30-01340006
Ashley Sims IIF392-120-10-06200004
Jakai RobinsonG161-11-10-01000003
Khalil WilliamsF141-21-20-01000003
Ethane BourgadeF10-00-00-00000000
UMBC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ace ValentineG376-101-32-344100015
Josh OdunowoF295-50-05-660010015
DJ Armstrong Jr.G323-90-54-441000010
Jose Roberto TanchynF283-81-52-213013009
Jah'Likai KingG283-71-30-02100007
Caden DiggsF211-60-04-43010006
Cougar DowningG132-32-30-01000006
Riley JacobsF121-30-00-04000002

Advanced Game Stats

63.3Possessions63.3
91.6Offensive Efficiency110.6
110.6Defensive Efficiency91.6
-19.0Net Efficiency19.0
43.1%Effective FG%52.0%
47.9%True Shooting %58.3%
15.5%Turnover Rate19.3%
39.2%Free Throw Rate37.3%
45.1%3-Point Rate37.3%
0.80Assist / Turnover0.50
Game Summary
UMBC won by 12 points. The game played at approximately 63.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.