
Mercyhurst
17-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
40.5%Mercyhurst
59.5%Central Connecticut
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCentral Connecticut -3.5
PROJECTED TOTAL140.5
MODEL MONEYLINECentral Connecticut -147

Central Connecticut
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMercyhurst 69
Projected Total140.5
Projected ScoreCentral Connecticut 72
Team Comparison
45.5MMH Power Index44.4
105.2Offensive Efficiency111.4
102.2Defensive Efficiency107.0
3.0Net Efficiency4.4
-5.7Strength of Schedule-7.7
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.5
65.9Tempo66.3
50.5%Effective FG%54.0%
14.4%Turnover Rate15.9%
26.8%Offensive Rebound %28.2%
25.4%Free Throw Rate31.3%
2.0Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Central Connecticut HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY59.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCentral Connecticut holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (111.4–105.2), net efficiency (4.4–3.0), shooting efficiency (54.0–50.5), offensive rebounding (28.2–26.8).
Mercyhurst COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (45.5–44.4), defensive efficiency (102.2–107.0), strength of schedule (-5.7–-7.7).