Northeastern

8-23

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

12.5%Northeastern

87.5%William & Mary

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADWilliam & Mary -13.9

PROJECTED TOTAL162.4

MODEL MONEYLINEWilliam & Mary -700

William & Mary

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreNortheastern 74

Projected Total162.4

Projected ScoreWilliam & Mary 88

Team Comparison

NortheasternMetricWilliam & Mary

40.9MMH Power Index53.8

107.1Offensive Efficiency112.5

115.7Defensive Efficiency105.2

-8.6Net Efficiency7.3

2.7Strength of Schedule-1.5

-14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency3.5

69.9Tempo73.9

52.7%Effective FG%55.3%

16.4%Turnover Rate16.4%

27.0%Offensive Rebound %26.7%

29.9%Free Throw Rate45.3%

-6.0Average Margin5.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

William & Mary HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

8–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWilliam & Mary holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.8–40.9), offensive efficiency (112.5–107.1), defensive efficiency (105.2–115.7), net efficiency (7.3–-8.6).

Northeastern COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (2.7–-1.5), offensive rebounding (27.0–26.7).

Final

Northeastern

77—84

William & Mary

William & Mary by 7 • 79.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NortheasternTEAM STATWilliam & Mary

30-60FG25-55

50.0%FG%45.0%

11-293PT2-18

38.0%3PT%11.0%

6-9FT32-39

67.0%FT%82.0%

38Rebounds28

6Offensive Rebounds2

17Assists20

22Turnovers8

4Steals14

1Blocks3

28Fouls13

Player Box Score

Northeastern

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Ryan Williams	G	35	11-16	7-10	0-0	3	4	0	0	29
Mike Loughnane	G	38	5-14	2-6	2-3	8	9	0	0	14
Youri Fritz	F	31	6-7	0-0	1-2	12	1	0	0	13
JB Frankel	G	37	3-12	2-10	2-2	3	2	3	0	10
Ty Francis	F	13	3-5	0-0	1-2	4	0	0	0	7
Petar Pinter	C	13	1-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	1	2
Haris Elezovic	F	8	1-2	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	2
Luca Soroa Schaller	G	21	0-3	0-2	0-0	3	1	0	0	0
Liam Koelsch	C	4	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	1	0	0

William & Mary

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kilian Brockhoff	F	23	7-13	0-4	7-8	4	1	3	0	21
Jo'el Emanuel	F	25	3-7	1-2	9-11	1	1	2	0	16
Tunde Vahlberg Fasasi	F	29	2-4	0-2	8-8	5	5	4	0	12
Kyle Pulliam	G	28	3-7	0-2	5-6	4	3	1	1	11
Reese Miller	G	27	4-7	1-3	0-2	2	5	1	0	9
Chase Lowe	G	21	3-7	0-0	1-1	3	3	2	0	7
Finn Lally	F	11	2-3	0-1	0-0	0	0	0	0	4
Ryan Jackson Jr.	G	18	1-2	0-0	0-0	4	0	0	1	2
Kyle Frazier	G	4	0-1	0-1	2-3	1	1	1	0	2
Cade Haskins	F	14	0-4	0-3	0-0	0	1	0	1	0

Advanced Game Stats

79.9Possessions79.9

96.4Offensive Efficiency105.1

105.1Defensive Efficiency96.4

-8.8Net Efficiency8.8

59.2%Effective FG%47.3%

59.9%True Shooting %57.1%

27.4%Turnover Rate10.1%

15.0%Free Throw Rate70.9%

48.3%3-Point Rate32.7%

0.77Assist / Turnover2.50

Game Summary

William & Mary won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 79.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.