
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.6%UTEP
80.4%Middle Tennessee
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMiddle Tennessee -9.9
PROJECTED TOTAL145.7
MODEL MONEYLINEMiddle Tennessee -410

Middle Tennessee
17-15MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 68
Projected Total145.7
Projected ScoreMiddle Tennessee 78
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index52.5
102.6Offensive Efficiency109.6
107.1Defensive Efficiency105.7
-4.5Net Efficiency3.9
1.7Strength of Schedule0.4
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency3.2
67.6Tempo68.8
49.2%Effective FG%52.2%
17.3%Turnover Rate16.7%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %31.3%
35.6%Free Throw Rate33.2%
-3.1Average Margin2.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Middle Tennessee HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMiddle Tennessee holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.5–44.4), offensive efficiency (109.6–102.6), defensive efficiency (105.7–107.1), net efficiency (3.9–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–0.4), free throw rate (35.6–33.2).