
UT Arlington
18-14GAME THAT MATTERSAT
18.6%UT Arlington
81.4%California Baptist
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCalifornia Baptist -9.3
PROJECTED TOTAL137.5
MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia Baptist -438

California Baptist
25-9MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUT Arlington 64
Projected Total137.5
Projected ScoreCalifornia Baptist 73
Team Comparison
49.6MMH Power Index58.3
102.7Offensive Efficiency106.5
97.9Defensive Efficiency99.0
4.8Net Efficiency7.5
-0.8Strength of Schedule1.8
-3.9Last 10 Net Efficiency11.0
68.1Tempo68.2
48.5%Effective FG%48.8%
20.4%Turnover Rate17.9%
36.0%Offensive Rebound %37.0%
43.7%Free Throw Rate37.0%
3.3Average Margin5.1
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
California Baptist HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCalifornia Baptist holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (58.3–49.6), offensive efficiency (106.5–102.7), net efficiency (7.5–4.8), strength of schedule (1.8–-0.8).
UT Arlington COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (97.9–99.0), free throw rate (43.7–37.0).