Merrimack

23-11

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

84.5%Merrimack

15.5%Canisius

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADMerrimack -8.9

PROJECTED TOTAL132.3

MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -545

Canisius

10-21

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMerrimack 71

Projected Total132.3

Projected ScoreCanisius 62

Team Comparison

MerrimackMetricCanisius

53.7MMH Power Index33.9

106.4Offensive Efficiency97.1

103.2Defensive Efficiency108.8

3.2Net Efficiency-11.7

0.7Strength of Schedule-1.8

12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0

64.4Tempo64.8

49.3%Effective FG%46.8%

14.8%Turnover Rate19.6%

24.7%Offensive Rebound %29.1%

39.5%Free Throw Rate32.4%

2.1Average Margin-7.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Merrimack HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY84.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

10–1

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–33.9), offensive efficiency (106.4–97.1), defensive efficiency (103.2–108.8), net efficiency (3.2–-11.7).

Canisius COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (29.1–24.7).

Final

Merrimack

62—67

Canisius

Canisius by 5 • 60.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MerrimackTEAM STATCanisius

19-48FG22-49

40.0%FG%45.0%

6-273PT7-13

22.0%3PT%54.0%

18-24FT16-17

75.0%FT%94.0%

25Rebounds32

6Offensive Rebounds8

10Assists15

7Turnovers12

8Steals3

2Blocks2

13Fouls17

Player Box Score

Merrimack

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Kevair Kennedy	G	37	8-10	1-2	8-13	6	2	0	0	25
Ernest Shelton	G	40	4-12	1-8	2-2	1	2	1	0	11
Tye Dorset	G	38	4-13	2-7	1-2	2	2	5	1	11
Todd Brogna	F	35	3-8	2-5	2-2	8	1	1	0	10
Andrés Marrero	G	33	0-5	0-5	5-5	5	3	0	0	5
Dylan Veillette	F	14	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	1	1	0
Jaylen Stinson	G	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Canisius

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Bryan Ndjonga	F	33	6-15	0-1	6-7	7	2	0	0	18
Kahlil Singleton	G	40	5-8	4-5	3-3	6	2	0	0	17
Mike Evbagharu	G	33	6-9	0-0	5-5	5	2	0	1	17
Javante Edwards	G	34	3-6	3-5	0-0	4	1	2	0	9
King Ijeoma	F	8	1-1	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	0	4
Max Jusianiec	G	20	1-4	0-0	0-0	2	4	0	1	2
Myles Wilmoth	F	16	0-3	0-1	0-0	1	2	1	0	0
Evan van der Plas	F	14	0-2	0-1	0-0	2	2	0	0	0
Brendan Oliver	F	2	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

60.8Possessions60.8

102.0Offensive Efficiency110.2

110.2Defensive Efficiency102.0

-8.2Net Efficiency8.2

45.8%Effective FG%52.0%

52.2%True Shooting %58.7%

11.6%Turnover Rate19.6%

50.0%Free Throw Rate34.7%

56.3%3-Point Rate26.5%

1.43Assist / Turnover1.25

Game Summary

Canisius won by 5 points. The game played at approximately 60.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.