
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.4%Harvard
37.6%Princeton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL137.8
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -166

Princeton
9-20MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 70
Projected Total137.8
Projected ScorePrinceton 68
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index43.5
108.1Offensive Efficiency105.1
102.9Defensive Efficiency110.3
5.2Net Efficiency-5.2
-0.1Strength of Schedule1.7
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
64.8Tempo65.2
53.4%Effective FG%50.3%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.9%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %27.5%
27.9%Free Throw Rate35.0%
3.4Average Margin-3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Harvard HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY62.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–43.5), offensive efficiency (108.1–105.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.3), net efficiency (5.2–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-0.1), ball security (16.9–17.2), offensive rebounding (27.5–26.3).