Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
62.4%Harvard
37.6%Princeton
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADHarvard -2.4
PROJECTED TOTAL137.8
MODEL MONEYLINEHarvard -166
Princeton logo

Princeton

9-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 70
Projected Total137.8
Projected ScorePrinceton 68

Team Comparison

52.6MMH Power Index43.5
108.1Offensive Efficiency105.1
102.9Defensive Efficiency110.3
5.2Net Efficiency-5.2
-0.1Strength of Schedule1.7
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-8.2
64.8Tempo65.2
53.4%Effective FG%50.3%
17.2%Turnover Rate16.9%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %27.5%
27.9%Free Throw Rate35.0%
3.4Average Margin-3.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Harvard HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY62.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
74
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMHarvard holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.6–43.5), offensive efficiency (108.1–105.1), defensive efficiency (102.9–110.3), net efficiency (5.2–-5.2).
Princeton COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (1.7–-0.1), ball security (16.9–17.2), offensive rebounding (27.5–26.3).
Final
Harvard logo
Harvard
5856
Princeton logo
Princeton
Harvard by 260.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATPrinceton
22-58FG23-44
38.0%FG%52.0%
6-303PT5-12
20.0%3PT%42.0%
8-11FT5-6
73.0%FT%83.0%
29Rebounds25
12Offensive Rebounds3
10Assists12
10Turnovers15
9Steals3
2Blocks
7Fouls12

Player Box Score

Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Robert HintonG397-181-80-031200015
Tey BarbourG345-134-110-050100014
Ben EisendrathG345-120-61-124100011
Thomas Batties IIIF364-71-41-240010010
Chandler PiggeG361-70-16-89340008
Frankie ManninoG100-00-00-02210000
Luca Ace-NasteskiF50-10-00-02001000
Dutch DowdellG30-00-00-00000000
Xavier NesbittG30-00-00-01000000
Princeton
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dalen DavisG348-152-40-041000018
Jackson HickeG365-142-43-412000015
Peyton SealsG204-61-30-01010009
Malik AbdullahiF393-40-02-25210008
Sebastian WhitfieldF132-30-00-02000004
Landon ClarkG311-20-10-05510002
Jacob HugginsF270-00-00-06200000

Advanced Game Stats

60.1Possessions60.1
96.5Offensive Efficiency93.2
93.2Defensive Efficiency96.5
3.3Net Efficiency-3.3
43.1%Effective FG%58.0%
45.9%True Shooting %59.8%
16.3%Turnover Rate25.5%
19.0%Free Throw Rate13.6%
51.7%3-Point Rate27.3%
1.00Assist / Turnover0.80
Game Summary
Harvard won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 60.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Effective FG%, True Shooting %, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.