
Dartmouth
11-16GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.2%Dartmouth
85.8%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -11.2
PROJECTED TOTAL153.8
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -604

Pennsylvania
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreDartmouth 71
Projected Total153.8
Projected ScorePennsylvania 83
Team Comparison
41.3MMH Power Index52.9
108.2Offensive Efficiency108.6
109.5Defensive Efficiency106.4
-1.3Net Efficiency2.2
-2.2Strength of Schedule1.9
-14.0Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
70.1Tempo69.9
52.9%Effective FG%50.9%
17.4%Turnover Rate15.4%
25.6%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
38.4%Free Throw Rate36.3%
-0.9Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–41.3), offensive efficiency (108.6–108.2), defensive efficiency (106.4–109.5), net efficiency (2.2–-1.3).
Dartmouth COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (52.9–50.9), free throw rate (38.4–36.3).