Texas

21-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

47.3%Texas

52.7%Texas A&M

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADTexas A&M -2.0

PROJECTED TOTAL160.8

MODEL MONEYLINETexas A&M -111

Texas A&M

20-12

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreTexas 79

Projected Total160.8

Projected ScoreTexas A&M 81

Team Comparison

TexasMetricTexas A&M

61.6MMH Power Index58

119.6Offensive Efficiency116.1

110.1Defensive Efficiency108.4

9.5Net Efficiency7.7

5.3Strength of Schedule4.8

-5.4Last 10 Net Efficiency-7.2

69.2Tempo69.1

55.1%Effective FG%53.5%

15.5%Turnover Rate14.8%

35.9%Offensive Rebound %31.7%

44.3%Free Throw Rate37.5%

6.6Average Margin5.3

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Texas HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY52.7%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTexas holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.6–58.0), offensive efficiency (119.6–116.1), net efficiency (9.5–7.7), strength of schedule (5.3–4.8).

Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (108.4–110.1), ball security (14.8–15.5).

Final

Texas

76—76

Texas A&M

Tied • 68.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TexasTEAM STATTexas A&M

27-62FG27-62

44.0%FG%44.0%

7-213PT7-21

33.0%3PT%33.0%

15-16FT15-16

94.0%FT%94.0%

41Rebounds41

12Offensive Rebounds12

8Assists8

11Turnovers11

4Steals4

9Blocks9

18Fouls18

Player Box Score

Texas

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tramon Mark	G	33	7-13	2-6	7-7	4	2	1	1	23
Jordan Pope	G	39	6-11	2-5	3-4	4	1	1	1	17
Matas Vokietaitis	C	24	6-7	0-0	2-2	7	2	0	1	14
Dailyn Swain	G	29	4-12	1-2	2-2	10	1	0	1	11
Chendall Weaver	G	24	2-6	0-2	1-1	5	1	2	1	5
Camden Heide	F	21	1-6	1-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Simeon Wilcher	G	12	1-3	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	3
Nic Codie	F	18	0-4	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	3	0

Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Tramon Mark	G	33	7-13	2-6	7-7	4	2	1	1	23
Jordan Pope	G	39	6-11	2-5	3-4	4	1	1	1	17
Matas Vokietaitis	C	24	6-7	0-0	2-2	7	2	0	1	14
Dailyn Swain	G	29	4-12	1-2	2-2	10	1	0	1	11
Chendall Weaver	G	24	2-6	0-2	1-1	5	1	2	1	5
Camden Heide	F	21	1-6	1-4	0-0	2	0	0	0	3
Simeon Wilcher	G	12	1-3	1-1	0-0	1	0	0	1	3
Nic Codie	F	18	0-4	0-1	0-0	4	1	0	3	0

Advanced Game Stats

68.6Possessions68.6

110.8Offensive Efficiency110.8

110.8Defensive Efficiency110.8

0.0Net Efficiency0.0

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

54.6%True Shooting %54.6%

16.0%Turnover Rate16.0%

25.8%Free Throw Rate25.8%

33.9%3-Point Rate33.9%

0.73Assist / Turnover0.73

Game Summary

Neither team finished level. The game played at approximately 68.6 possessions.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.