Iowa logo

Iowa

24-13
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
87.3%Iowa
12.7%Penn State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIowa -11.3
PROJECTED TOTAL148.2
MODEL MONEYLINEIowa -687
Penn State logo

Penn State

12-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreIowa 80
Projected Total148.2
Projected ScorePenn State 68

Team Comparison

64.2MMH Power Index42.3
118.4Offensive Efficiency109.2
105.2Defensive Efficiency117.6
13.2Net Efficiency-8.4
5.3Strength of Schedule5.3
2.0Last 10 Net Efficiency-20.8
63.0Tempo67.5
56.6%Effective FG%53.4%
15.1%Turnover Rate15.6%
30.2%Offensive Rebound %25.6%
36.2%Free Throw Rate34.6%
8.3Average Margin-5.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Iowa HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY87.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
100
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMIowa holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (64.2–42.3), offensive efficiency (118.4–109.2), defensive efficiency (105.2–117.6), net efficiency (13.2–-8.4).
Final
Iowa logo
Iowa
6971
Penn State logo
Penn State
Penn State by 259.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

IowaTEAM STATPenn State
26-57FG25-39
46.0%FG%64.0%
9-283PT9-15
32.0%3PT%60.0%
8-9FT12-16
89.0%FT%75.0%
24Rebounds24
10Offensive Rebounds2
17Assists13
8Turnovers15
7Steals3
1Blocks2
15Fouls13

Player Box Score

Iowa
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cooper KochF316-95-71-111000018
Bennett StirtzG406-152-72-215010016
Cam ManyawuF243-40-02-27230008
Kael CombsG244-70-20-02200008
Tavion BanksG292-40-12-27120006
Alvaro FolgueirasF172-60-31-22310005
Isaia HowardG152-51-20-03210005
Tate SageG51-31-30-00000003
Brendan HausenG150-40-30-00100000
Penn State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Josh ReedF359-123-44-434100025
Freddie Dilione VG345-103-62-252110015
Ivan JuricF295-60-01-382000011
Kayden MingoG282-41-14-61300009
Dominick StewartG343-32-20-03201008
Saša CianiF111-10-00-03000002
Melih TuncaG140-20-11-10010001
Eli RiceG100-10-10-00000000
Mason BlackwoodF50-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

59.5Possessions59.5
116.0Offensive Efficiency119.3
119.3Defensive Efficiency116.0
-3.4Net Efficiency3.4
53.5%Effective FG%75.6%
56.3%True Shooting %76.2%
13.5%Turnover Rate25.2%
15.8%Free Throw Rate41.0%
49.1%3-Point Rate38.5%
2.13Assist / Turnover0.87
Game Summary
Penn State won by 2 points. The game played at approximately 59.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Free Throw Rate, Effective FG%, True Shooting %.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.