Oklahoma State

20-15

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

19.8%Oklahoma State

80.2%Cincinnati

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADCincinnati -9.8

PROJECTED TOTAL156.4

MODEL MONEYLINECincinnati -405

Cincinnati

18-15

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreOklahoma State 73

Projected Total156.4

Projected ScoreCincinnati 83

Team Comparison

Oklahoma StateMetricCincinnati

53.5MMH Power Index61.5

112.1Offensive Efficiency105.3

111.2Defensive Efficiency97.3

0.9Net Efficiency8.0

6.1Strength of Schedule5.1

-8.5Last 10 Net Efficiency14.4

74.8Tempo69.4

52.2%Effective FG%50.6%

15.8%Turnover Rate17.0%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.6%

40.3%Free Throw Rate30.7%

0.7Average Margin5.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Cincinnati HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY80.2%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCincinnati holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (61.5–53.5), defensive efficiency (97.3–111.2), net efficiency (8.0–0.9), recent form (14.4–-8.5).

Oklahoma State COUNTERS WITHoffensive efficiency (112.1–105.3), strength of schedule (6.1–5.1), shooting efficiency (52.2–50.6).

Final

Oklahoma State

68—91

Cincinnati

Cincinnati by 23 • 71.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Oklahoma StateTEAM STATCincinnati

22-54FG33-70

41.0%FG%47.0%

7-213PT14-34

33.0%3PT%41.0%

17-20FT11-15

85.0%FT%73.0%

32Rebounds43

5Offensive Rebounds14

15Assists24

14Turnovers8

6Steals6

—Blocks—

12Fouls12

Player Box Score

Oklahoma State

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Vyctorius Miller	G	24	5-9	3-5	2-2	0	1	2	15
Jaylen Curry	G	25	1-8	0-0	9-9	2	3	2	11
Kanye Clary	G	24	3-8	2-5	3-4	1	1	0	11
Andrija Vukovic	F	22	5-6	0-0	0-0	4	1	0	10
Isaiah Coleman	G	18	3-5	1-2	0-0	3	2	0	7
Christian Coleman	G	20	2-4	0-1	1-2	5	1	0	5
Benjamin Ahmed	C	20	2-3	0-0	1-1	8	1	1	5
Anthony Roy	G	15	1-6	1-4	1-2	4	1	0	4
Ryan Crotty	G	17	0-4	0-4	0-0	0	0	0	0
Daniel Guetta	G	12	0-1	0-0	0-0	2	4	1	0
Mekhi Ragland	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0

Cincinnati

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	PTS
Day Day Thomas	G	29	7-12	7-11	5-6	2	2	2	26
Moustapha Thiam	C	28	10-18	1-5	3-4	15	1	0	24
Baba Miller	F	31	5-6	0-0	1-3	8	8	0	11
Jizzle James	G	25	4-9	3-5	0-0	5	3	1	11
Jalen Celestine	G	24	3-8	2-6	0-0	1	2	1	8
Keyshuan Tillery	G	25	2-9	1-5	0-0	2	5	1	5
Halvine Dzellat	C	12	1-2	0-0	2-2	2	0	0	4
Shon Abaev	G	13	1-3	0-1	0-0	2	2	1	2
Sencire Harris	G	10	0-2	0-1	0-0	0	1	0	0
Grant Darbyshire	G	3	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

71.8Possessions71.8

94.7Offensive Efficiency126.7

126.7Defensive Efficiency94.7

-32.0Net Efficiency32.0

47.2%Effective FG%57.1%

53.5%True Shooting %59.0%

19.3%Turnover Rate11.2%

37.0%Free Throw Rate21.4%

38.9%3-Point Rate48.6%

1.07Assist / Turnover3.00

Game Summary

Cincinnati won by 23 points. The game played at approximately 71.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.