
Mercyhurst
17-17GAME THAT MATTERSAT
58.4%Mercyhurst
41.6%Stonehill
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMercyhurst -0.9
PROJECTED TOTAL134.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMercyhurst -140

Stonehill
12-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMercyhurst 68
Projected Total134.4
Projected ScoreStonehill 67
Team Comparison
45.5MMH Power Index37.9
105.2Offensive Efficiency97.5
102.2Defensive Efficiency100.7
3.0Net Efficiency-3.2
-5.7Strength of Schedule-5.4
3.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-3.4
65.9Tempo68.1
50.5%Effective FG%48.0%
14.4%Turnover Rate19.1%
26.8%Offensive Rebound %28.4%
25.4%Free Throw Rate29.2%
2.0Average Margin-2.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Mercyhurst HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY58.4%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
7–4
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMercyhurst holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (45.5–37.9), offensive efficiency (105.2–97.5), net efficiency (3.0–-3.2), recent form (3.2–-3.4).
Stonehill COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (100.7–102.2), strength of schedule (-5.4–-5.7), offensive rebounding (28.4–26.8).