Maine

8-24

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

46.2%Maine

53.8%Binghamton

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADBinghamton -1.8

PROJECTED TOTAL132.5

MODEL MONEYLINEBinghamton -116

Binghamton

8-22

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreMaine 65

Projected Total132.5

Projected ScoreBinghamton 67

Team Comparison

MaineMetricBinghamton

35.6MMH Power Index32.4

95.6Offensive Efficiency102.2

104.6Defensive Efficiency112.3

-9.0Net Efficiency-10.1

-1.8Strength of Schedule-6.0

-6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-6.2

65.4Tempo64.2

50.5%Effective FG%51.3%

19.0%Turnover Rate18.5%

19.4%Offensive Rebound %21.5%

38.5%Free Throw Rate42.8%

-5.9Average Margin-6.5

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Binghamton HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY53.8%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

6–5

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMBinghamton holds the advantage in offensive efficiency (102.2–95.6), recent form (-6.2–-6.8), shooting efficiency (51.3–50.5), ball security (18.5–19.0).

Maine COUNTERS WITHMMH Power Index (35.6–32.4), defensive efficiency (104.6–112.3), net efficiency (-9.0–-10.1).

Final

Maine

67—74

Binghamton

Binghamton by 7 • 65.8 estimated possessions

Team Stats

MaineTEAM STATBinghamton

23-50FG28-52

46.0%FG%54.0%

9-203PT9-21

45.0%3PT%43.0%

12-19FT9-16

63.0%FT%56.0%

27Rebounds31

3Offensive Rebounds4

14Assists11

9Turnovers11

7Steals4

2Blocks2

14Fouls15

Player Box Score

Maine

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Mekhi Gray	G	33	7-14	2-5	3-4	5	2	0	0	19
Ryan Mabrey	G	36	4-10	4-7	0-0	2	2	1	0	12
Ace Flagg	F	30	4-9	0-1	4-6	2	3	3	0	12
Keelan Steele	F	32	4-5	0-0	2-3	10	1	0	2	10
Logan Carey	G	34	2-7	2-4	3-4	3	5	0	0	9
Amare Allen	F	14	1-3	1-2	0-0	1	1	3	0	3
Caleb Crawford	G	15	1-2	0-1	0-2	1	0	0	0	2
Emmitt Byther	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Yanis Bamba	F	3	0-0	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Binghamton

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jeremiah Quigley	G	40	10-16	0-1	4-5	12	5	1	0	24
Wes Peterson Jr.	G	40	5-11	2-5	3-4	8	4	0	1	15
Jackson Benigni	G	40	4-9	4-9	2-2	2	0	2	0	14
Jake Blackburn	G	27	4-7	3-6	0-0	2	1	0	0	11
Stephan Snagg	F	40	3-5	0-0	0-3	1	0	1	1	6
Zyier Beverly	F	12	2-4	0-0	0-2	3	1	0	0	4
Nevin Ibroci	G	1	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

65.8Possessions65.8

101.8Offensive Efficiency112.5

112.5Defensive Efficiency101.8

-10.6Net Efficiency10.6

55.0%Effective FG%62.5%

56.8%True Shooting %62.1%

13.8%Turnover Rate16.5%

38.0%Free Throw Rate30.8%

40.0%3-Point Rate40.4%

1.56Assist / Turnover1.00

Game Summary

Binghamton won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 65.8 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.