
UTEP
11-20GAME THAT MATTERSAT
14.7%UTEP
85.3%Western Kentucky
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADWestern Kentucky -11.8
PROJECTED TOTAL150.2
MODEL MONEYLINEWestern Kentucky -580

Western Kentucky
18-14MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreUTEP 69
Projected Total150.2
Projected ScoreWestern Kentucky 81
Team Comparison
44.4MMH Power Index55.6
102.6Offensive Efficiency110.6
107.1Defensive Efficiency106.2
-4.5Net Efficiency4.4
1.7Strength of Schedule1.7
-4.7Last 10 Net Efficiency5.2
67.6Tempo71.7
49.2%Effective FG%48.6%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.5%
27.6%Offensive Rebound %31.8%
35.6%Free Throw Rate42.9%
-3.1Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Western Kentucky HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY85.3%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWestern Kentucky holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.6–44.4), offensive efficiency (110.6–102.6), defensive efficiency (106.2–107.1), net efficiency (4.4–-4.5).
UTEP COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (49.2–48.6).