Nebraska logo

Nebraska

28-7
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
82.8%Nebraska
17.2%USC
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNebraska -8.8
PROJECTED TOTAL151.7
MODEL MONEYLINENebraska -481
USC logo

USC

18-14
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreNebraska 80
Projected Total151.7
Projected ScoreUSC 71

Team Comparison

67MMH Power Index48.3
114.4Offensive Efficiency108.5
98.3Defensive Efficiency107.6
16.1Net Efficiency0.9
6.1Strength of Schedule2.5
6.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-16.0
67.3Tempo72.4
55.6%Effective FG%50.7%
14.4%Turnover Rate17.2%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
26.9%Free Throw Rate45.3%
10.8Average Margin0.7
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Nebraska HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY82.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNebraska holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (67.0–48.3), offensive efficiency (114.4–108.5), defensive efficiency (98.3–107.6), net efficiency (16.1–0.9).
USC COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (33.2–26.3), free throw rate (45.3–26.9).
Final
Nebraska logo
Nebraska
8267
USC logo
USC
Nebraska by 1568.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

NebraskaTEAM STATUSC
30-68FG23-51
44.0%FG%45.0%
8-233PT4-21
35.0%3PT%19.0%
14-15FT17-18
93.0%FT%94.0%
41Rebounds25
18Offensive Rebounds5
20Assists17
12Turnovers14
9Steals5
3Blocks6
17Fouls15

Player Box Score

Nebraska
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Pryce SandfortF3812-215-103-362200032
Braden FragerF276-111-24-581100017
Rienk MastF324-121-42-263000011
Berke BuyuktuncelF244-70-01-16432009
Sam HoibergG273-61-30-05220007
Jamarques LawrenceG331-60-34-43711006
Cale JacobsenG130-20-10-01100000
Jared GarciaF50-30-00-03000000
Kendall BlueG10-00-00-00000000
USC
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Alijah ArenasG234-80-36-604100014
Chad Baker-MazaraG194-92-64-411120014
Kam WoodsG314-80-14-534200012
Jaden BrownellF304-102-70-051030010
Jerry Easter IIG263-50-00-04210006
Jacob CofieF253-60-20-01101006
Ezra AusarF201-40-13-32200005
Terrance Williams IIF210-10-10-04100000
Ryan CornishG40-00-00-00100000
EJ Neal Jr.G10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.9Possessions68.9
119.0Offensive Efficiency97.2
97.2Defensive Efficiency119.0
21.8Net Efficiency-21.8
50.0%Effective FG%49.0%
54.6%True Shooting %56.3%
17.4%Turnover Rate20.4%
22.1%Free Throw Rate35.3%
33.8%3-Point Rate41.2%
1.67Assist / Turnover1.21
Game Summary
Nebraska won by 15 points. The game played at approximately 68.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.