Pittsburgh logo

Pittsburgh

13-20
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
23.5%Pittsburgh
76.5%California
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADCalifornia -8.8
PROJECTED TOTAL148.1
MODEL MONEYLINECalifornia -326
California logo

California

22-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScorePittsburgh 70
Projected Total148.1
Projected ScoreCalifornia 78

Team Comparison

50.5MMH Power Index56.5
108.4Offensive Efficiency111.8
110.4Defensive Efficiency104.8
-2.0Net Efficiency7.0
5.5Strength of Schedule2.8
-6.9Last 10 Net Efficiency1.8
65.0Tempo69.9
51.4%Effective FG%52.6%
17.3%Turnover Rate14.9%
33.1%Offensive Rebound %26.6%
31.2%Free Throw Rate36.8%
-1.3Average Margin4.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

California HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
92
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMCalifornia holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.5–50.5), offensive efficiency (111.8–108.4), defensive efficiency (104.8–110.4), net efficiency (7.0–-2.0).
Pittsburgh COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–2.8), offensive rebounding (33.1–26.6).
Final
Pittsburgh logo
Pittsburgh
7256
California logo
California
Pittsburgh by 1666.9 estimated possessions

Team Stats

PittsburghTEAM STATCalifornia
26-56FG23-54
46.0%FG%43.0%
7-213PT5-22
33.0%3PT%23.0%
13-16FT5-7
81.0%FT%71.0%
34Rebounds29
9Offensive Rebounds7
14Assists9
13Turnovers16
11Steals8
3Blocks3
14Fouls16

Player Box Score

Pittsburgh
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Cameron CorhenF347-100-22-324400016
Nojus IndrusaitisG296-114-60-031000016
Barry Dunning Jr.G396-151-52-3120020015
Damarco MinorG373-62-45-631100013
Omari WitherspoonG332-60-12-25630006
Roman SiulepaF252-80-32-24131006
Macari MooreG30-00-00-01100000
California
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Dai Dai AmesG295-120-31-120100011
Lee DortF194-50-02-360100010
John CamdenF334-111-60-02120009
DeJuan CampbellG243-62-40-01000008
Justin PippenG343-111-40-02400007
Milos IlicC212-30-12-39421006
Chris BellF221-51-40-01000003
Nolan DorseyG31-10-00-01010002
Semetri CarrG90-00-00-00010000
Sammie YeanayF60-00-00-02002000

Advanced Game Stats

66.9Possessions66.9
107.6Offensive Efficiency83.7
83.7Defensive Efficiency107.6
23.9Net Efficiency-23.9
52.7%Effective FG%47.2%
56.6%True Shooting %48.8%
19.2%Turnover Rate24.1%
28.6%Free Throw Rate13.0%
37.5%3-Point Rate40.7%
1.08Assist / Turnover0.56
Game Summary
Pittsburgh won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 66.9 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.