
Colgate
18-15GAME THAT MATTERSAT
19.8%Colgate
80.2%Navy
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADNavy -10.3
PROJECTED TOTAL145.6
MODEL MONEYLINENavy -405

Navy
26-8MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreColgate 68
Projected Total145.6
Projected ScoreNavy 78
Team Comparison
48.8MMH Power Index56.8
111.7Offensive Efficiency113.2
109.0Defensive Efficiency97.6
2.7Net Efficiency15.6
-2.0Strength of Schedule-8.1
-0.3Last 10 Net Efficiency16.4
68.4Tempo65.9
54.5%Effective FG%53.7%
14.8%Turnover Rate17.1%
26.9%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
30.0%Free Throw Rate40.9%
1.8Average Margin10.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Navy HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMNavy holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (56.8–48.8), offensive efficiency (113.2–111.7), defensive efficiency (97.6–109.0), net efficiency (15.6–2.7).
Colgate COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-2.0–-8.1), shooting efficiency (54.5–53.7), ball security (14.8–17.1).