
Tennessee State
23-10GAME THAT MATTERSAT
52.9%Tennessee State
47.1%UT Martin
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADUT Martin -1.5
PROJECTED TOTAL144.0
MODEL MONEYLINETennessee State -112

UT Martin
22-11MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTennessee State 71
Projected Total144.0
Projected ScoreUT Martin 73
Team Comparison
55.4MMH Power Index49.8
110.9Offensive Efficiency103.8
102.7Defensive Efficiency94.0
8.2Net Efficiency9.8
-3.1Strength of Schedule-4.8
13.7Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.8
72.4Tempo67.2
50.9%Effective FG%49.5%
17.0%Turnover Rate21.4%
34.8%Offensive Rebound %37.9%
34.7%Free Throw Rate37.5%
5.9Average Margin6.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Tennessee State HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY52.9%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTennessee State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.4–49.8), offensive efficiency (110.9–103.8), strength of schedule (-3.1–-4.8), recent form (13.7–-0.8).
UT Martin COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (94.0–102.7), net efficiency (9.8–8.2), offensive rebounding (37.9–34.8).