East Texas A&M

11-21

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

8.0%East Texas A&M

92.0%UT Rio Grande Valley

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADUT Rio Grande Valley -16.2

PROJECTED TOTAL145.8

MODEL MONEYLINEUT Rio Grande Valley -1150

UT Rio Grande Valley

19-14

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreEast Texas A&M 65

Projected Total145.8

Projected ScoreUT Rio Grande Valley 81

Team Comparison

East Texas A&MMetricUT Rio Grande Valley

38.4MMH Power Index55.8

101.2Offensive Efficiency112.6

107.5Defensive Efficiency103.1

-6.3Net Efficiency9.5

-1.5Strength of Schedule-1.9

-9.1Last 10 Net Efficiency12.3

69.3Tempo67.4

50.7%Effective FG%55.7%

18.7%Turnover Rate17.9%

26.3%Offensive Rebound %29.2%

31.9%Free Throw Rate29.6%

-4.3Average Margin6.4

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

UT Rio Grande Valley HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY92.0%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

9–2

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMUT Rio Grande Valley holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (55.8–38.4), offensive efficiency (112.6–101.2), defensive efficiency (103.1–107.5), net efficiency (9.5–-6.3).

East Texas A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.5–-1.9), free throw rate (31.9–29.6).

Final

East Texas A&M

55—63

UT Rio Grande Valley

UT Rio Grande Valley by 8 • 57.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

East Texas A&MTEAM STATUT Rio Grande Valley

18-55FG22-51

33.0%FG%43.0%

6-283PT7-21

21.0%3PT%33.0%

13-19FT12-15

68.0%FT%80.0%

35Rebounds38

12Offensive Rebounds9

13Assists13

4Turnovers10

6Steals1

1Blocks3

13Fouls15

Player Box Score

East Texas A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Noah Pagotto	F	36	8-12	2-4	0-0	8	1	1	0	18
Gianni Hunt	G	37	2-14	0-7	6-8	4	6	2	0	10
Ronnie Harrison	F	35	3-11	0-4	4-6	7	1	1	1	10
Tay Mosher	F	21	2-2	2-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	6
Josh Taylor	F	14	2-2	1-1	1-3	5	0	0	0	6
Damian Garcia	G	32	1-11	1-7	2-2	3	4	2	0	5
Evan Phelps	G	15	0-1	0-1	0-0	2	1	0	0	0
Vinny Sigona	G	10	0-2	0-2	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

UT Rio Grande Valley

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Julien Gomez	G	33	4-7	2-5	4-5	2	0	0	0	14
Filip Brankovic	F	28	5-10	1-3	2-3	9	4	0	0	13
Koree Cotton	G	31	5-12	1-4	1-1	8	3	0	1	12
Jaylen Washington	G	33	4-9	0-1	2-2	5	4	0	0	10
Marvin McGhee III	G	35	2-6	2-6	2-2	7	1	0	0	8
Dane Christensen	F	15	1-2	1-1	1-2	3	0	0	0	4
Kwo Agwa	F	10	1-2	0-0	0-0	0	1	0	2	2
Always Wright	G	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0
Zae Blake	G	6	0-2	0-1	0-0	1	0	1	0	0
Demarris Winters	G	2	0-0	0-0	0-0	0	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

57.6Possessions57.6

95.5Offensive Efficiency109.4

109.4Defensive Efficiency95.5

-13.9Net Efficiency13.9

38.2%Effective FG%50.0%

43.0%True Shooting %54.2%

7.1%Turnover Rate16.9%

34.5%Free Throw Rate29.4%

50.9%3-Point Rate41.2%

3.25Assist / Turnover1.30

Game Summary

UT Rio Grande Valley won by 8 points. The game played at approximately 57.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.