Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.8%Harvard
63.2%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -3.8
PROJECTED TOTAL143.9
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -172
Pennsylvania logo

Pennsylvania

18-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 70
Projected Total143.9
Projected ScorePennsylvania 74

Team Comparison

52.6MMH Power Index52.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency108.6
102.9Defensive Efficiency106.4
5.2Net Efficiency2.2
-0.1Strength of Schedule1.9
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
64.8Tempo69.9
53.4%Effective FG%50.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
27.9%Free Throw Rate36.3%
3.4Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
65
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–52.6), offensive efficiency (108.6–108.1), strength of schedule (1.9–-0.1), ball security (15.4–17.2).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–106.4), net efficiency (5.2–2.2), recent form (8.3–2.3).
Final
Harvard logo
Harvard
6164
Pennsylvania logo
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania by 371.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATPennsylvania
24-58FG26-62
41.0%FG%42.0%
6-253PT6-17
24.0%3PT%35.0%
7-9FT6-10
78.0%FT%60.0%
37Rebounds36
8Offensive Rebounds10
11Assists9
19Turnovers13
7Steals7
3Blocks1
14Fouls13

Player Box Score

Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Robert HintonG3810-170-20-050110020
Thomas Batties IIIF387-114-71-181020019
Chandler PiggeG364-140-31-17410009
Tey BarbourG352-72-63-54110009
Ben EisendrathG271-40-20-05320002
Frankie ManninoG120-20-22-22220002
Luca Ace-NasteskiF70-10-10-02000000
Xavier NesbittG60-10-10-01000000
Joseph QuarteyG10-10-10-00000000
Pennsylvania
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ethan RobertsF329-221-62-243200021
AJ LevineG305-130-03-671100013
TJ PowerF383-83-60-09121009
Lucas LuethF243-30-00-02010006
Niklas PolonowskiF82-31-20-01000005
Cam ThrowerG171-31-20-02210003
Jay JonesG121-40-01-23100003
Michael ZanoniF241-40-10-01000002
Augustus GerhartF121-10-00-02100002
Dalton ScantleburyC30-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.6Possessions71.6
85.2Offensive Efficiency89.4
89.4Defensive Efficiency85.2
-4.2Net Efficiency4.2
46.6%Effective FG%46.8%
49.0%True Shooting %47.9%
25.9%Turnover Rate18.6%
15.5%Free Throw Rate16.1%
43.1%3-Point Rate27.4%
0.58Assist / Turnover0.69
Game Summary
Pennsylvania won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 71.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.