
Harvard
17-12GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.8%Harvard
63.2%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -3.8
PROJECTED TOTAL143.9
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -172

Pennsylvania
18-12MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 70
Projected Total143.9
Projected ScorePennsylvania 74
Team Comparison
52.6MMH Power Index52.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency108.6
102.9Defensive Efficiency106.4
5.2Net Efficiency2.2
-0.1Strength of Schedule1.9
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
64.8Tempo69.9
53.4%Effective FG%50.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
27.9%Free Throw Rate36.3%
3.4Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY63.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–52.6), offensive efficiency (108.6–108.1), strength of schedule (1.9–-0.1), ball security (15.4–17.2).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–106.4), net efficiency (5.2–2.2), recent form (8.3–2.3).