Harvard logo

Harvard

17-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
36.8%Harvard
63.2%Pennsylvania
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADPennsylvania -3.8
PROJECTED TOTAL143.9
MODEL MONEYLINEPennsylvania -172
Pennsylvania logo

Pennsylvania

18-12
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreHarvard 70
Projected Total143.9
Projected ScorePennsylvania 74

Team Comparison

52.6MMH Power Index52.9
108.1Offensive Efficiency108.6
102.9Defensive Efficiency106.4
5.2Net Efficiency2.2
-0.1Strength of Schedule1.9
8.3Last 10 Net Efficiency2.3
64.8Tempo69.9
53.4%Effective FG%50.9%
17.2%Turnover Rate15.4%
26.3%Offensive Rebound %31.1%
27.9%Free Throw Rate36.3%
3.4Average Margin1.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Pennsylvania HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY63.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
6–5
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMPennsylvania holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (52.9–52.6), offensive efficiency (108.6–108.1), strength of schedule (1.9–-0.1), ball security (15.4–17.2).
Harvard COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (102.9–106.4), net efficiency (5.2–2.2), recent form (8.3–2.3).
Final
Harvard logo
Harvard
61—64
Pennsylvania logo
Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania by 3 • 71.6 estimated possessions

Team Stats

HarvardTEAM STATPennsylvania
24-58FG26-62
41.0%FG%42.0%
6-253PT6-17
24.0%3PT%35.0%
7-9FT6-10
78.0%FT%60.0%
37Rebounds36
8Offensive Rebounds10
11Assists9
19Turnovers13
7Steals7
3Blocks1
14Fouls13

Player Box Score

Harvard
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Robert HintonG3810-170-20-050110020
Thomas Batties IIIF387-114-71-181020019
Chandler PiggeG364-140-31-17410009
Tey BarbourG352-72-63-54110009
Ben EisendrathG271-40-20-05320002
Frankie ManninoG120-20-22-22220002
Luca Ace-NasteskiF70-10-10-02000000
Xavier NesbittG60-10-10-01000000
Joseph QuarteyG10-10-10-00000000
Pennsylvania
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Ethan RobertsF329-221-62-243200021
AJ LevineG305-130-03-671100013
TJ PowerF383-83-60-09121009
Lucas LuethF243-30-00-02010006
Niklas PolonowskiF82-31-20-01000005
Cam ThrowerG171-31-20-02210003
Jay JonesG121-40-01-23100003
Michael ZanoniF241-40-10-01000002
Augustus GerhartF121-10-00-02100002
Dalton ScantleburyC30-10-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

71.6Possessions71.6
85.2Offensive Efficiency89.4
89.4Defensive Efficiency85.2
-4.2Net Efficiency4.2
46.6%Effective FG%46.8%
49.0%True Shooting %47.9%
25.9%Turnover Rate18.6%
15.5%Free Throw Rate16.1%
43.1%3-Point Rate27.4%
0.58Assist / Turnover0.69
Game Summary
Pennsylvania won by 3 points. The game played at approximately 71.6 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Turnover Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.