Weber State logo

Weber State

16-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
49.2%Weber State
50.8%Idaho State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADIdaho State -0.5
PROJECTED TOTAL157.7
MODEL MONEYLINEIdaho State -103
Idaho State logo

Idaho State

13-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreWeber State 79
Projected Total157.7
Projected ScoreIdaho State 79

Team Comparison

50.2MMH Power Index45.9
113.6Offensive Efficiency111.0
108.2Defensive Efficiency113.4
5.4Net Efficiency-2.4
-3.4Strength of Schedule0.2
-1.8Last 10 Net Efficiency-9.6
71.5Tempo67.1
52.6%Effective FG%52.2%
15.5%Turnover Rate16.5%
32.6%Offensive Rebound %33.9%
38.3%Free Throw Rate39.1%
3.9Average Margin-1.6
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Weber State HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY50.8%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
8–3
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMWeber State holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.2–45.9), offensive efficiency (113.6–111.0), defensive efficiency (108.2–113.4), net efficiency (5.4–-2.4).
Idaho State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (0.2–-3.4), offensive rebounding (33.9–32.6), free throw rate (39.1–38.3).
Final
Weber State logo
Weber State
83—73
Idaho State logo
Idaho State
Weber State by 10 • 68.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Weber StateTEAM STATIdaho State
30-58FG27-69
52.0%FG%39.0%
8-203PT7-21
40.0%3PT%33.0%
15-19FT12-17
79.0%FT%71.0%
37Rebounds35
9Offensive Rebounds14
10Assists11
9Turnovers6
4Steals6
3Blocks7
12Fouls16

Player Box Score

Weber State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Tijan Saine Jr.G348-152-76-624000024
Viljami VartiainenG356-104-80-060000016
Trevor HennigG316-121-40-131000013
Nigel BurrisF273-61-14-491010011
Malek GommaF284-60-01-25100009
Edwin Suarez Jr.F163-50-01-25240007
Duce PaschalG80-20-02-24100002
ArDarius GraysonG150-20-01-22000001
Declan CutlerF60-00-00-01002000
Idaho State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Connor HollenbeckF287-120-11-161000015
Caleb Van De GriendF216-120-13-581210015
Gus EtchisonPG205-122-63-317000015
Jamison GuerraPG205-123-50-061000013
Lachlan BrewerG281-61-32-26021005
Blake DaberkowF111-30-03-61001005
Cheikh SowG161-31-10-03020003
Evan OttenF101-30-00-01104002
Martin KheilG280-40-30-02000000
Louis BondG180-20-10-01000000

Advanced Game Stats

68.1Possessions68.1
121.9Offensive Efficiency107.2
107.2Defensive Efficiency121.9
14.7Net Efficiency-14.7
58.6%Effective FG%44.2%
61.9%True Shooting %47.4%
13.4%Turnover Rate8.7%
32.8%Free Throw Rate24.6%
34.5%3-Point Rate30.4%
1.11Assist / Turnover1.83
Game Summary
Weber State won by 10 points. The game played at approximately 68.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.