Oklahoma logo

Oklahoma

21-16
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
59.2%Oklahoma
40.8%LSU
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADOklahoma -0.5
PROJECTED TOTAL164.6
MODEL MONEYLINEOklahoma -145
LSU logo

LSU

15-17
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreOklahoma 83
Projected Total164.6
Projected ScoreLSU 82

Team Comparison

62.1MMH Power Index54.2
119.5Offensive Efficiency115.5
111.6Defensive Efficiency111.3
7.9Net Efficiency4.2
3.2Strength of Schedule4.5
12.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-12.8
69.4Tempo70.5
55.1%Effective FG%53.4%
14.4%Turnover Rate15.6%
32.4%Offensive Rebound %33.2%
36.2%Free Throw Rate41.9%
5.5Average Margin2.9
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Oklahoma HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY59.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
74
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMOklahoma holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (62.1–54.2), offensive efficiency (119.5–115.5), net efficiency (7.9–4.2), recent form (12.3–-12.8).
LSU COUNTERS WITHdefensive efficiency (111.3–111.6), strength of schedule (4.5–3.2), offensive rebounding (33.2–32.4).
Final
Oklahoma logo
Oklahoma
8367
LSU logo
LSU
Oklahoma by 1665.3 estimated possessions

Team Stats

OklahomaTEAM STATLSU
28-59FG22-63
47.0%FG%35.0%
10-263PT6-23
38.0%3PT%26.0%
17-18FT17-19
94.0%FT%89.0%
35Rebounds37
11Offensive Rebounds16
8Assists14
8Turnovers10
6Steals5
4Blocks4
14Fouls14

Player Box Score

Oklahoma
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nijel PackG318-145-110-024100021
Xzayvier BrownG326-102-36-620200020
Dayton ForsytheG173-71-36-601000013
Mohamed WagueF245-80-00-091030010
Tae DavisF332-70-13-46100007
Jadon JonesG232-51-30-05031005
Kirill ElatontsevC141-30-22-22000004
Derrion ReidF251-51-30-07100003
Kai RogersF10-00-00-00000000
LSU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Max MackinnonG376-201-74-422000017
PJ CarterG134-74-60-020000012
Mike NwokoF203-40-05-631000011
Pablo TambaF323-70-24-5101200010
Marquel SuttonF262-61-22-24110007
Robert Miller IIIF202-40-02-28014006
Jalen ReeceG341-100-40-01810002
Rashad KingG181-50-20-02100002

Advanced Game Stats

65.3Possessions65.3
127.1Offensive Efficiency102.6
102.6Defensive Efficiency127.1
24.5Net Efficiency-24.5
55.9%Effective FG%39.7%
61.4%True Shooting %46.5%
12.4%Turnover Rate15.1%
30.5%Free Throw Rate30.2%
44.1%3-Point Rate36.5%
1.00Assist / Turnover1.40
Game Summary
Oklahoma won by 16 points. The game played at approximately 65.3 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.