TCU logo

TCU

23-12
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
71.0%TCU
29.0%Kansas State
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTCU -4.8
PROJECTED TOTAL158.7
MODEL MONEYLINETCU -245
Kansas State logo

Kansas State

12-20
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreTCU 82
Projected Total158.7
Projected ScoreKansas State 77

Team Comparison

59.7MMH Power Index47.1
110.2Offensive Efficiency107.8
102.7Defensive Efficiency110.9
7.5Net Efficiency-3.1
4.6Strength of Schedule5.5
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-14.3
70.2Tempo73.8
50.5%Effective FG%53.5%
15.3%Turnover Rate17.4%
33.6%Offensive Rebound %29.4%
38.3%Free Throw Rate27.4%
5.3Average Margin-2.3
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

TCU HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY71.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTCU holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (59.7–47.1), offensive efficiency (110.2–107.8), defensive efficiency (102.7–110.9), net efficiency (7.5–-3.1).
Kansas State COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (5.5–4.6), shooting efficiency (53.5–50.5).
Final
TCU logo
TCU
77—68
Kansas State logo
Kansas State
TCU by 9 • 72.1 estimated possessions

Team Stats

TCUTEAM STATKansas State
27-63FG28-56
43.0%FG%50.0%
7-273PT8-23
26.0%3PT%35.0%
16-23FT4-9
70.0%FT%44.0%
36Rebounds31
11Offensive Rebounds5
17Assists19
8Turnovers18
12Steals7
4Blocks4
12Fouls18

Player Box Score

TCU
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Xavier EdmondsF335-81-44-8133320015
Tanner ToolsonG234-123-53-441100014
David PunchF264-100-25-651110013
Liutauras LeleviciusG225-90-32-231000012
Micah RobinsonF303-91-42-32121009
Brock HardingG343-72-40-04640008
Jayden PierreG313-80-50-01410006
Vianney SalatchoumC10-00-00-00000000
Kansas State
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
P.J. HaggertyG399-140-20-075000018
Nate JohnsonG376-124-70-059300016
Khamari McGriffF184-60-00-03010008
Taj ManningF313-80-01-410012007
Elias RapiequeF162-32-30-01200006
Andrej KosticF142-52-50-02000006
David CastilloG251-40-32-30310004
C.J. JonesG201-40-31-22012003

Advanced Game Stats

72.1Possessions72.1
106.8Offensive Efficiency94.3
94.3Defensive Efficiency106.8
12.5Net Efficiency-12.5
48.4%Effective FG%57.1%
52.1%True Shooting %56.4%
11.3%Turnover Rate24.6%
36.5%Free Throw Rate16.1%
42.9%3-Point Rate41.1%
2.13Assist / Turnover1.06
Game Summary
TCU won by 9 points. The game played at approximately 72.1 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Turnover Rate.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.