Florida A&M

14-16

GAME THAT MATTERSAT

32.5%Florida A&M

67.5%Grambling

MMH WIN PROBABILITY

MODEL SPREADGrambling -6.6

PROJECTED TOTAL142.5

MODEL MONEYLINEGrambling -208

Grambling

14-19

MMH MODEL PROJECTION

Projected ScoreFlorida A&M 68

Projected Total142.5

Projected ScoreGrambling 75

Team Comparison

Florida A&MMetricGrambling

39.4MMH Power Index41.4

98.7Offensive Efficiency100.7

105.6Defensive Efficiency100.4

-6.9Net Efficiency0.3

-3.2Strength of Schedule-5.7

4.5Last 10 Net Efficiency-0.4

70.6Tempo69.9

49.2%Effective FG%49.2%

21.6%Turnover Rate20.9%

30.5%Offensive Rebound %30.4%

38.0%Free Throw Rate42.2%

-4.8Average Margin0.2

MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE

MODEL READ

Grambling HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY67.5%

STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE

7–3

MMH comparison metrics

WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMGrambling holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (41.4–39.4), offensive efficiency (100.7–98.7), defensive efficiency (100.4–105.6), net efficiency (0.3–-6.9).

Florida A&M COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-3.2–-5.7), recent form (4.5–-0.4), offensive rebounding (30.5–30.4).

Final

Florida A&M

66—59

Grambling

Florida A&M by 7 • 67.5 estimated possessions

Team Stats

Florida A&MTEAM STATGrambling

27-58FG20-60

47.0%FG%33.0%

3-153PT8-23

20.0%3PT%35.0%

9-12FT11-13

75.0%FT%85.0%

40Rebounds32

12Offensive Rebounds12

12Assists8

16Turnovers13

7Steals6

5Blocks1

14Fouls16

Player Box Score

Florida A&M

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Jaquan Sanders	G	34	7-11	1-5	1-2	4	1	2	0	16
Antonio Baker Jr.	G	32	4-11	0-2	4-4	7	0	1	0	12
Miles Ndalama	C	22	5-7	0-0	2-4	7	2	0	2	12
Tyler Shirley	F	33	3-9	0-2	2-2	8	4	2	1	8
Kaleb Washington	F	23	4-10	0-1	0-0	3	1	0	0	8
Micah Octave	G	33	3-6	1-2	0-0	6	2	2	1	7
Jordan Chatman	G	23	1-4	1-3	0-0	1	2	0	1	3

Grambling

Player	Pos	Min	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	PTS
Derrius Ward	G	40	6-17	4-9	1-2	5	2	0	0	17
Roderick Coffee III	F	38	4-10	2-6	0-0	6	1	1	0	10
Jamil Muttilib	G	19	3-6	2-4	2-2	0	1	1	0	10
Jimel Lane	F	27	3-9	0-1	2-2	5	1	2	0	8
Antonio Munoz	F	27	3-8	0-0	1-1	3	2	0	1	7
Devyn Franklin	G	22	0-4	0-0	3-4	2	1	1	0	3
Rickey Ballard	F	17	0-3	0-3	2-2	4	0	1	0	2
Saliou Seye	F	3	1-2	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	2
Richard Amaefule	F	7	0-1	0-0	0-0	1	0	0	0	0

Advanced Game Stats

67.5Possessions67.5

97.8Offensive Efficiency87.4

87.4Defensive Efficiency97.8

10.4Net Efficiency-10.4

49.1%Effective FG%40.0%

51.8%True Shooting %44.6%

23.6%Turnover Rate19.4%

20.7%Free Throw Rate21.7%

25.9%3-Point Rate38.3%

0.75Assist / Turnover0.62

Game Summary

Florida A&M won by 7 points. The game played at approximately 67.5 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Offensive Efficiency, Defensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.