
Quinnipiac
19-13GAME THAT MATTERSAT
80.2%Quinnipiac
19.8%Canisius
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADQuinnipiac -7.8
PROJECTED TOTAL139.9
MODEL MONEYLINEQuinnipiac -405

Canisius
10-21MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreQuinnipiac 74
Projected Total139.9
Projected ScoreCanisius 66
Team Comparison
51MMH Power Index33.9
106.8Offensive Efficiency97.1
102.1Defensive Efficiency108.8
4.7Net Efficiency-11.7
-2.3Strength of Schedule-1.8
2.2Last 10 Net Efficiency-10.0
70.5Tempo64.8
48.9%Effective FG%46.8%
15.6%Turnover Rate19.6%
34.1%Offensive Rebound %29.1%
34.1%Free Throw Rate32.4%
3.4Average Margin-7.5
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Quinnipiac HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY80.2%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
10–1
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMQuinnipiac holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (51.0–33.9), offensive efficiency (106.8–97.1), defensive efficiency (102.1–108.8), net efficiency (4.7–-11.7).
Canisius COUNTERS WITHstrength of schedule (-1.8–-2.3).