Rice logo

Rice

13-18
GAME THAT MATTERSAT
24.0%Rice
76.0%Temple
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADTemple -8.0
PROJECTED TOTAL147.8
MODEL MONEYLINETemple -317
Temple logo

Temple

16-16
MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreRice 70
Projected Total147.8
Projected ScoreTemple 78

Team Comparison

45.1MMH Power Index50.9
108.3Offensive Efficiency112.2
109.2Defensive Efficiency107.4
-0.9Net Efficiency4.8
-2.2Strength of Schedule-2.0
-4.3Last 10 Net Efficiency-1.5
68.3Tempo65.9
49.7%Effective FG%51.1%
17.8%Turnover Rate13.7%
35.7%Offensive Rebound %28.8%
34.7%Free Throw Rate42.3%
-0.6Average Margin3.2
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ

Temple HAS THE EDGE

WIN PROBABILITY76.0%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
101
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMTemple holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (50.9–45.1), offensive efficiency (112.2–108.3), defensive efficiency (107.4–109.2), net efficiency (4.8–-0.9).
Rice COUNTERS WITHoffensive rebounding (35.7–28.8).
Final
Rice logo
Rice
8074
Temple logo
Temple
Rice by 665.2 estimated possessions

Team Stats

RiceTEAM STATTemple
29-56FG25-50
52.0%FG%50.0%
8-263PT5-17
31.0%3PT%29.0%
14-19FT19-26
74.0%FT%73.0%
28Rebounds25
7Offensive Rebounds8
14Assists10
8Turnovers10
7Steals3
3Blocks1
21Fouls19

Player Box Score

Rice
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Nick AndersonG346-132-87-1163200021
Jalen SmithG374-84-53-404100015
Trae BroadnaxG296-131-42-242110015
Stephen GiwaC144-40-00-04000008
Andrew AkuchieF163-40-10-04011006
Trey PattersonF152-51-30-00001005
Cam CarrollG311-60-52-26420004
Jimmy Oladokun Jr.F132-20-00-01100004
Eternity EguagieF91-10-00-02000002
Bodey HowellG20-00-00-00000000
Temple
PlayerPosMinFG3PTFTREBASTSTLBLKTOPFPTS
Derrian FordG375-161-59-1030100020
Aiden TobiasonG357-92-24-531000020
Masiah GilyardG304-71-32-462000011
Jordan MasonG314-100-30-02401008
Jamai FeltF212-20-03-45100007
Gavin GriffithsG272-51-40-13000005
Babatunde DurodolaF141-10-01-20200003
Ayuba Bryant Jr.F40-00-00-00020000
Mohamed KeitaC10-00-00-00000000

Advanced Game Stats

65.2Possessions65.2
122.7Offensive Efficiency113.5
113.5Defensive Efficiency122.7
9.2Net Efficiency-9.2
58.9%Effective FG%55.0%
61.5%True Shooting %59.3%
12.1%Turnover Rate15.5%
33.9%Free Throw Rate52.0%
46.4%3-Point Rate34.0%
1.75Assist / Turnover1.00
Game Summary
Rice won by 6 points. The game played at approximately 65.2 possessions. The largest advanced-stat separations came in Net Efficiency, Free Throw Rate, Offensive Efficiency.

Advanced game metrics are calculated by Mid-Major Hoops from team box-score totals. Possessions are estimated. Highlighted advanced values indicate the stronger result for that metric; lower is better for defensive efficiency and turnover rate.