
Merrimack
23-11GAME THAT MATTERSAT
81.5%Merrimack
18.5%Niagara
MMH WIN PROBABILITY
MODEL SPREADMerrimack -7.9
PROJECTED TOTAL133.4
MODEL MONEYLINEMerrimack -441

Niagara
8-22MMH MODEL PROJECTION
Projected ScoreMerrimack 71
Projected Total133.4
Projected ScoreNiagara 63
Team Comparison
53.7MMH Power Index35.8
106.4Offensive Efficiency100.8
103.2Defensive Efficiency112.4
3.2Net Efficiency-11.6
0.7Strength of Schedule-0.8
12.9Last 10 Net Efficiency-5.6
64.4Tempo63.4
49.3%Effective FG%50.9%
14.8%Turnover Rate18.8%
24.7%Offensive Rebound %24.9%
39.5%Free Throw Rate27.3%
2.1Average Margin-7.4
MMH GAME INTELLIGENCE
MODEL READ
Merrimack HAS THE EDGE
WIN PROBABILITY81.5%
STATISTICAL ADVANTAGE
9–2
MMH comparison metrics
WHERE THE EDGE COMES FROMMerrimack holds the advantage in MMH Power Index (53.7–35.8), offensive efficiency (106.4–100.8), defensive efficiency (103.2–112.4), net efficiency (3.2–-11.6).
Niagara COUNTERS WITHshooting efficiency (50.9–49.3), offensive rebounding (24.9–24.7).